FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 50
Rules governing contents of warranties
15 U.S.C. § 2302
Title15 — Commerce and Trade
Chapter50 — CONSUMER PRODUCT WARRANTIES
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 2302 (Rules governing contents of warranties) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 2302.
Text
(a)Full and conspicuous disclosure of terms and conditions; additional requirements for contents
In order to improve the adequacy of information available to consumers, prevent deception, and improve competition in the marketing of consumer products, any warrantor warranting a consumer product to a consumer by means of a written warranty shall, to the extent required by rules of the Commission, fully and conspicuously disclose in simple and readily understood language the terms and conditions of such warranty. Such rules may require inclusion in the written warranty of any of the following items among others:
(1)The clear identification of the names and addresses of the warrantors.
(2)The identity of the party or parties to whom the warranty is extended.
(3)The products or parts covere
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Razor v. Hyundai Motor America
854 N.E.2d 607 (Illinois Supreme Court, 2006)
Rich Hill and Enza Hill, on Behalf of a Class of Persons Similarly Situated v. Gateway 2000, Inc., and David Prais
105 F.3d 1147 (Seventh Circuit, 1997)
Borowiec v. GATEWAY 2000, INC.
808 N.E.2d 957 (Illinois Supreme Court, 2004)
Robert E. Kelly Virginia L. Kelly v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.
377 F.3d 1034 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Thomas E. Walton Le'ellen Walton v. Rose Mobile Homes Llc, Southern Energy Homes, Inc.
298 F.3d 470 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated v. Federal Trade Commission
691 F.2d 1322 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Koons Ford of Baltimore, Inc. v. Lobach
919 A.2d 722 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2007)
Nicolyn S. Wilbur v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Tri-Nordic, Inc.
86 F.3d 23 (Second Circuit, 1996)
Brazil v. Dole Food Co.
935 F. Supp. 2d 947 (N.D. California, 2013)
Crickenberger v. Hyundai Motor America
944 A.2d 1136 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2008)
Cincinnati Sub-Zero Products, Inc. v. Augustine Medical, Inc.
800 F. Supp. 1549 (S.D. Ohio, 1992)
Robert Leflar v. Target Corporation
57 F.4th 600 (Eighth Circuit, 2023)
Daimler Chrysler Corp. v. Yaeger
818 N.E.2d 527 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2004)
Thicklin v. Fantasy Mobile Homes, Inc.
824 So. 2d 723 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2002)
Krol v. FCA US, LLC
273 So. 3d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Tucker v. Ford Motor Co.
72 Va. Cir. 420 (Fairfax County Circuit Court, 2007)
Heymer v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLC
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2024)
Robert E. Kelly Virginia L. Kelly v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.
369 F.3d 1102 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Mydlach v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation
(Illinois Supreme Court, 2007)
Mitsch v. General Motors Corp.
(Appellate Court of Illinois, 2005)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 93–637, title I, §102, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2185; Pub. L. 114–51, §3(a), Sept. 24, 2015, 129 Stat. 494.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2015—Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 114–51 added par. (4).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Findings
Pub. L. 114–51, §2, Sept. 24, 2015, 129 Stat. 494, provided that: "Congress makes the following findings:
"(1) Many manufacturers and consumers prefer to have the option to provide or receive warranty information online.
"(2) Modernizing warranty notification rules is necessary to allow the United States to continue to compete globally in manufacturing, trade, and the development of consumer products connected to the Internet.
"(3) Allowing an electronic warranty option would expand consumer access to relevant consumer information in an environmentally friendly way, and would provide additional flexibility to manufacturers to meet their labeling and warranty requirements."
Revision of Rules
Pub. L. 114–51, §3(b), Sept. 24, 2015, 129 Stat. 495, provided that:
"(1) In general.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 24, 2015], the Federal Trade Commission shall revise the rules prescribed under such section [meaning section 102(b) of Pub. L. 93–637, which is classified to subsec. (b) of this section] to comply with the requirements of paragraph (4) of such section, as added by subsection (a) of this section [amending this section].
"(2) Authority to waive requirement for oral presentation.—In revising rules under paragraph (1), the Federal Trade Commission may waive the requirement of section 109(a) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 2309(a)) to give interested persons an opportunity for oral presentation if the Commission determines that giving interested persons such opportunity would interfere with the ability of the Commission to revise rules under paragraph (1) in a timely manner."
Amendments
2015—Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 114–51 added par. (4).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Findings
Pub. L. 114–51, §2, Sept. 24, 2015, 129 Stat. 494, provided that: "Congress makes the following findings:
"(1) Many manufacturers and consumers prefer to have the option to provide or receive warranty information online.
"(2) Modernizing warranty notification rules is necessary to allow the United States to continue to compete globally in manufacturing, trade, and the development of consumer products connected to the Internet.
"(3) Allowing an electronic warranty option would expand consumer access to relevant consumer information in an environmentally friendly way, and would provide additional flexibility to manufacturers to meet their labeling and warranty requirements."
Revision of Rules
Pub. L. 114–51, §3(b), Sept. 24, 2015, 129 Stat. 495, provided that:
"(1) In general.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 24, 2015], the Federal Trade Commission shall revise the rules prescribed under such section [meaning section 102(b) of Pub. L. 93–637, which is classified to subsec. (b) of this section] to comply with the requirements of paragraph (4) of such section, as added by subsection (a) of this section [amending this section].
"(2) Authority to waive requirement for oral presentation.—In revising rules under paragraph (1), the Federal Trade Commission may waive the requirement of section 109(a) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 2309(a)) to give interested persons an opportunity for oral presentation if the Commission determines that giving interested persons such opportunity would interfere with the ability of the Commission to revise rules under paragraph (1) in a timely manner."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 2302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/2302.