FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 50

Rules governing contents of warranties

15 U.S.C. § 2302
Title15Commerce and Trade
Chapter50 — CONSUMER PRODUCT WARRANTIES

This text of 15 U.S.C. § 2302 (Rules governing contents of warranties) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 2302.

Text

(a)Full and conspicuous disclosure of terms and conditions; additional requirements for contents In order to improve the adequacy of information available to consumers, prevent deception, and improve competition in the marketing of consumer products, any warrantor warranting a consumer product to a consumer by means of a written warranty shall, to the extent required by rules of the Commission, fully and conspicuously disclose in simple and readily understood language the terms and conditions of such warranty. Such rules may require inclusion in the written warranty of any of the following items among others:
(1)The clear identification of the names and addresses of the warrantors.
(2)The identity of the party or parties to whom the warranty is extended.
(3)The products or parts covere

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Razor v. Hyundai Motor America
854 N.E.2d 607 (Illinois Supreme Court, 2006)
169 case citations
Borowiec v. GATEWAY 2000, INC.
808 N.E.2d 957 (Illinois Supreme Court, 2004)
143 case citations
Robert E. Kelly Virginia L. Kelly v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.
377 F.3d 1034 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
133 case citations
Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated v. Federal Trade Commission
691 F.2d 1322 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
92 case citations
Koons Ford of Baltimore, Inc. v. Lobach
919 A.2d 722 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2007)
40 case citations
Nicolyn S. Wilbur v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Tri-Nordic, Inc.
86 F.3d 23 (Second Circuit, 1996)
31 case citations
Brazil v. Dole Food Co.
935 F. Supp. 2d 947 (N.D. California, 2013)
29 case citations
Crickenberger v. Hyundai Motor America
944 A.2d 1136 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2008)
18 case citations
Cincinnati Sub-Zero Products, Inc. v. Augustine Medical, Inc.
800 F. Supp. 1549 (S.D. Ohio, 1992)
14 case citations
Robert Leflar v. Target Corporation
57 F.4th 600 (Eighth Circuit, 2023)
11 case citations
Daimler Chrysler Corp. v. Yaeger
818 N.E.2d 527 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2004)
7 case citations
Thicklin v. Fantasy Mobile Homes, Inc.
824 So. 2d 723 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2002)
2 case citations
Krol v. FCA US, LLC
273 So. 3d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
1 case citations
Tucker v. Ford Motor Co.
72 Va. Cir. 420 (Fairfax County Circuit Court, 2007)
1 case citations
Mydlach v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation
(Illinois Supreme Court, 2007)
Mitsch v. General Motors Corp.
(Appellate Court of Illinois, 2005)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 93–637, title I, §102, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2185; Pub. L. 114–51, §3(a), Sept. 24, 2015, 129 Stat. 494.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2015—Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 114–51 added par. (4).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Findings
Pub. L. 114–51, §2, Sept. 24, 2015, 129 Stat. 494, provided that: "Congress makes the following findings:
"(1) Many manufacturers and consumers prefer to have the option to provide or receive warranty information online.
"(2) Modernizing warranty notification rules is necessary to allow the United States to continue to compete globally in manufacturing, trade, and the development of consumer products connected to the Internet.
"(3) Allowing an electronic warranty option would expand consumer access to relevant consumer information in an environmentally friendly way, and would provide additional flexibility to manufacturers to meet their labeling and warranty requirements."

Revision of Rules
Pub. L. 114–51, §3(b), Sept. 24, 2015, 129 Stat. 495, provided that:
"(1) In general.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 24, 2015], the Federal Trade Commission shall revise the rules prescribed under such section [meaning section 102(b) of Pub. L. 93–637, which is classified to subsec. (b) of this section] to comply with the requirements of paragraph (4) of such section, as added by subsection (a) of this section [amending this section].
"(2) Authority to waive requirement for oral presentation.—In revising rules under paragraph (1), the Federal Trade Commission may waive the requirement of section 109(a) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 2309(a)) to give interested persons an opportunity for oral presentation if the Commission determines that giving interested persons such opportunity would interfere with the ability of the Commission to revise rules under paragraph (1) in a timely manner."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 2302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/2302.