FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Repealed. Pub. L. 101–588, §3, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2880
15 U.S.C. § 20
Title15 — Commerce and Trade
Chapter1 — MONOPOLIES AND COMBINATIONS IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE
Current throughPub. L. 119-99
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 20 (Repealed. Pub. L. 101–588, §3, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2880) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 20.
Text
Repealed. Pub. L. 101–588, §3, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2880
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bangor Punta Operations, Inc. v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad
417 U.S. 703 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United States
361 U.S. 173 (Supreme Court, 1960)
Independent Iron Works, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.
322 F.2d 656 (Ninth Circuit, 1963)
United States v. Boston & Maine Railroad
380 U.S. 157 (Supreme Court, 1965)
Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. United States
387 U.S. 485 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,807 in Re the Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company Securities and Antitrust Litigation, Appeal of Objector Irving Trust Company, as Trustee
543 F.2d 1058 (Third Circuit, 1976)
Schleiff v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
43 F.R.D. 175 (S.D. New York, 1967)
John M. Cleary v. O. Roy Chalk
488 F.2d 1315 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
Charlotte Klinger and Eric Klinger v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, and Edward C. Rose
432 F.2d 506 (Second Circuit, 1970)
Committee of Consumer Services v. Public Service Commission
595 P.2d 871 (Utah Supreme Court, 1979)
REA Express, Inc. v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co.
343 F. Supp. 851 (S.D. New York, 1972)
Florida Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Power Commission, (Two Cases). Florida Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Power Commission
362 F.2d 331 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)
United States v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
339 F. Supp. 554 (D. Colorado, 1972)
Diana K. Powell v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit Systems, Inc., Intervenor
466 F.2d 466 (D.C. Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Crocker National Corp.
656 F.2d 428 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
In Re Smith
365 B.R. 770 (S.D. Ohio, 2007)
Independent Iron Works, Inc. v. United States Steel Corporation
322 F.2d 656 (Ninth Circuit, 1963)
Fischer v. CF & I Steel Corp.
657 F. Supp. 1195 (S.D. New York, 1987)
Klinger v. Rose
291 F. Supp. 456 (S.D. New York, 1968)
In the Matter of PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Debtor, v. IRVING TRUST COMPANY, as Indenture Trustee, Appellant
594 F.2d 952 (Third Circuit, 1979)
Editorial Notes
Section, act Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §10, 38 Stat. 734, related to a $50,000 yearly, aggregate limitation on purchases and contracts between a common carrier and any entity with whom such carrier has any form of interlocking directorate, etc., required filing with ICC of a full statement of transactions excluded from such limitation, and set forth fines and penalties for violation of such limitation.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/20.