FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 41
Prohibition on use of "Rule of 78's" in connection with mortgage refinancings and other consumer loans
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
(a)Prompt refund of unearned interest required
(1)In general
If a consumer prepays in full the financed amount under any consumer credit transaction, the creditor shall promptly refund any unearned portion of the interest charge to the consumer.
(2)Exception for refund of de minimus 1 amount
No refund shall be required under paragraph (1) with respect to the prepayment of any consumer credit transaction if the total amount of the refund would be less than $1.
(3)Applicability to refinanced transactions and acceleration by the creditor
This subsection shall apply with respect to any prepayment of a consumer credit transaction described in paragraph (1) without regard to the manner or the reason for the prepayment, including—
(A)any prepayment made in connection with the refinancing, co
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
15 U.S.C. § 1615 (Prohibition on use of "Rule of 78's" in connection with mortgage refinancings and other consumer loans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vallies v. Sky Bank
591 F.3d 152 (Third Circuit, 2009)
Wiskup v. Liberty Buick Co., Inc.
953 F. Supp. 958 (N.D. Illinois, 1997)
Richardson v. Capital One, N.A.
839 F. Supp. 2d 197 (District of Columbia, 2012)
In Re McMurray
218 B.R. 867 (E.D. Tennessee, 1998)
Richardson v. Capital One, N.A.
544 F. App'x 3 (D.C. Circuit, 2013)
Davis v. Pacific Capital Bank, NA
550 F.3d 915 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Anderson v. Navy Federal Credit Union
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Greene II v. Discover Bank
(N.D. California, 2024)
Arnold v. Santander Consumer USA
(D. Connecticut, 2025)
Hernandez v. Capital One
(W.D. Oklahoma, 2025)
Thomas v. Wells Fargo Bank
(S.D. Alabama, 2024)
American Pearl Group, L.L.C., a Texas Limited Liability Company; John Sarkissian; Andrei Wirth v. National Payment Systems, L.L.C.
(Texas Supreme Court, 2025)
Davis v. Pacific Capital Bank
(Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Thieriot v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
(N.D. California, 2025)
Slocum v. Value Max Finance Company S-Corp.
(E.D. North Carolina, 2024)
Slocum v. Zen Realty
(E.D. North Carolina, 2024)
Thomas v. ServBank
(S.D. Alabama, 2023)
Linwood v. Anderson
(C.D. Illinois, 2021)
Woodly v. Baltimore Gas & Electric
(D. Maryland, 2024)
Amer Pearl Grp v. Natl Payment Sys
(Fifth Circuit, 2024)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 102–550, title IX, §933, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3891.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was enacted as part of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, and not as part of the Consumer Credit Protection Act which comprises this chapter.
Codification
Section was enacted as part of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, and not as part of the Consumer Credit Protection Act which comprises this chapter.