FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—CONSUMER CREDIT COST DISCLOSURE
Prohibition on use of "Rule of 78's" in connection with mortgage refinancings and other consumer loans
15 U.S.C. § 1615
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 1615 (Prohibition on use of "Rule of 78's" in connection with mortgage refinancings and other consumer loans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 1615.
Text
(a)Prompt refund of unearned interest required
If a consumer prepays in full the financed amount under any consumer credit transaction, the creditor shall promptly refund any unearned portion of the interest charge to the consumer.
No refund shall be required under paragraph (1) with respect to the prepayment of any consumer credit transaction if the total amount of the refund would be less than $1.
This subsection shall apply with respect to any prepayment of a consumer credit transaction described in paragraph (1) without regard to the manner or the reason for the prepayment, including—
(A)any prepayment made in connection with the refinancing, consolidation, or restructuring of the transaction; and
(B)any prepayment made as a result of the acceleration of the obligation to repay the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Vallies v. Sky Bank
591 F.3d 152 (Third Circuit, 2009)
Wiskup v. Liberty Buick Co., Inc.
953 F. Supp. 958 (N.D. Illinois, 1997)
Richardson v. Capital One, N.A.
839 F. Supp. 2d 197 (District of Columbia, 2012)
In Re McMurray
218 B.R. 867 (E.D. Tennessee, 1998)
Richardson v. Capital One, N.A.
544 F. App'x 3 (D.C. Circuit, 2013)
Davis v. Pacific Capital Bank, NA
550 F.3d 915 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Anderson v. Navy Federal Credit Union
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Greene II v. Discover Bank
(N.D. California, 2024)
Arnold v. Santander Consumer USA
(D. Connecticut, 2025)
Hernandez v. Capital One
(W.D. Oklahoma, 2025)
Thomas v. Wells Fargo Bank
(S.D. Alabama, 2024)
American Pearl Group, L.L.C., a Texas Limited Liability Company; John Sarkissian; Andrei Wirth v. National Payment Systems, L.L.C.
(Texas Supreme Court, 2025)
Davis v. Pacific Capital Bank
(Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Thieriot v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
(N.D. California, 2025)
Slocum v. Value Max Finance Company S-Corp.
(E.D. North Carolina, 2024)
Slocum v. Zen Realty
(E.D. North Carolina, 2024)
Thomas v. ServBank
(S.D. Alabama, 2023)
Linwood v. Anderson
(C.D. Illinois, 2021)
Woodly v. Baltimore Gas & Electric
(D. Maryland, 2024)
Amer Pearl Grp v. Natl Payment Sys
(Fifth Circuit, 2024)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 102–550, title IX, §933, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3891.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was enacted as part of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, and not as part of the Consumer Credit Protection Act which comprises this chapter.
Codification
Section was enacted as part of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, and not as part of the Consumer Credit Protection Act which comprises this chapter.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 1615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/1615.