FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Suits by United States; amount of recovery; prejudgment interest
15 U.S.C. § 15a
Title15 — Commerce and Trade
Chapter1 — MONOPOLIES AND COMBINATIONS IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 15a (Suits by United States; amount of recovery; prejudgment interest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 15a.
Text
Whenever the United States is hereafter injured in its business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws it may sue therefor in the United States district court for the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by it sustained and the cost of suit. The court may award under this section, pursuant to a motion by the United States promptly made, simple interest on actual damages for the period beginning on the date of service of the pleading of the United States setting forth a claim under the antitrust laws and ending on the date of judgment, or for any shorter period therein, if the court finds that the award of such interest for such period is just in t
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.
451 U.S. 630 (Supreme Court, 1981)
Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.
405 U.S. 251 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.
386 U.S. 129 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India
434 U.S. 308 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Marvin L. Fishman and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz, and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz
807 F.2d 520 (Seventh Circuit, 1987)
State of Illinois v. Sangamo Construction Co. And J. L. Simmons Company, Inc., Defendants
657 F.2d 855 (Seventh Circuit, 1981)
Linda Marie Zambrano, and Jose E. Tafolla, Esq. Philip W. Orr, Esq., Claimants-Appellants v. City of Tustin David Kreyling
885 F.2d 1473 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit District
664 A.2d 719 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1995)
United States Postal Service v. Flamingo Industries (USA) Ltd.
540 U.S. 736 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. The Alaska Railroad
659 F.2d 243 (D.C. Circuit, 1981)
Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp.
838 F.2d 1445 (Sixth Circuit, 1988)
United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime Family of La Cosa Nostra
683 F. Supp. 1411 (E.D. New York, 1988)
United States v. Azzarelli Construction Company, State of Illinois, Intervening
647 F.2d 757 (Seventh Circuit, 1981)
In re Ampicillin Antitrust Litigation
55 F.R.D. 269 (District of Columbia, 1972)
City of Burbank v. General Electric Co.
329 F.2d 825 (Ninth Circuit, 1964)
Colt Industries, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. The United States
880 F.2d 1311 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
Rux v. Republic of Sudan
495 F. Supp. 2d 541 (E.D. Virginia, 2007)
Maricopa County v. American Pipe and Construction Co.
303 F. Supp. 77 (D. Arizona, 1969)
Reeder-Simco Gmc, Inc. v. Volvo Gm Heavy Truck Corporation, Now Known as Volvo Trucks North America, Inc.
374 F.3d 701 (Eighth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Cofield
215 F.3d 164 (First Circuit, 2000)
Source Credit
History
(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §4A, as added July 7, 1955, ch. 283, §1, 69 Stat. 282; amended Pub. L. 96–349, §4(a)(2), Sept. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 1156; Pub. L. 101–588, §5, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2880.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The antitrust laws, referred to in text, are defined in section 12 of this title.
Amendments
1990—Pub. L. 101–588 substituted "threefold the" for "actual".
1980—Pub. L. 96–349 inserted provisions respecting award of prejudgment interest including considerations for the court in determining whether an award is just under the circumstances.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–349 applicable only with respect to actions commenced after Sept. 12, 1980, see section 4(b) of Pub. L. 96–349, set out as a note under section 15 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective six months after July 7, 1955, see note set out under section 15b of this title.
References in Text
The antitrust laws, referred to in text, are defined in section 12 of this title.
Amendments
1990—Pub. L. 101–588 substituted "threefold the" for "actual".
1980—Pub. L. 96–349 inserted provisions respecting award of prejudgment interest including considerations for the court in determining whether an award is just under the circumstances.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–349 applicable only with respect to actions commenced after Sept. 12, 1980, see section 4(b) of Pub. L. 96–349, set out as a note under section 15 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective six months after July 7, 1955, see note set out under section 15b of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 15a, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/15a.