FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 34

Civil investigative demands

15 U.S.C. § 1312
Title15Commerce and Trade
Chapter34 — ANTITRUST CIVIL PROCESS

This text of 15 U.S.C. § 1312 (Civil investigative demands) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 1312.

Text

(a)Issuance; service; production of material; testimony Whenever the Attorney General, or the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, has reason to believe that any person may be in possession, custody, or control of any documentary material, or may have any information, relevant to a civil antitrust investigation or, with respect to the International Antitrust Enforcement Assistance Act of 1994 [15 U.S.C. 6201 et seq.], an investigation authorized by section 3 of such Act [15 U.S.C. 6202], he may, prior to the institution of a civil or criminal proceeding by the United States thereon, issue in writing, and cause to be served upon such person, a civil investigative demand requiring such person to produce such documentary material for in

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michigan v. Tyler
436 U.S. 499 (Supreme Court, 1978)
1,384 case citations
United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.
463 U.S. 418 (Supreme Court, 1983)
514 case citations
Federal Trade Commission v. Compagnie De Saint-Gobain-Pont-A-Mousson
636 F.2d 1300 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
93 case citations
Pacific Pictures Corp. v. United States District Court
679 F.3d 1121 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
90 case citations
United States v. International Business Machines Corp.
83 F.R.D. 97 (S.D. New York, 1979)
75 case citations
United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
86 F.R.D. 603 (District of Columbia, 1979)
74 case citations
Mazzola v. Southern New England Telephone Co.
363 A.2d 170 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1975)
52 case citations
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. United States of America v. (Under Seal)
836 F.2d 1468 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)
45 case citations
GAF Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
85 F.R.D. 46 (S.D. New York, 1979)
37 case citations
United States v. Gaf Corporation, Eastman Kodak Company, Intervenor-Appellee
596 F.2d 10 (Second Circuit, 1979)
37 case citations
Martindell v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.
594 F.2d 291 (Second Circuit, 1979)
37 case citations
Hyster Company v. United States
338 F.2d 183 (Ninth Circuit, 1964)
32 case citations
H.L. Hayden Co. v. Siemens Medical Systems., Inc.
85 A.L.R. Fed. 525 (S.D. New York, 1985)
28 case citations
United States of America, in No. 82-1605 v. Fmc Corporation, in No. 82-1640
717 F.2d 775 (Third Circuit, 1983)
16 case citations
United States v. Union Oil Company of California
343 F.2d 29 (Ninth Circuit, 1965)
10 case citations
In re Domestic Air Transportation Antitrust Litigation
142 F.R.D. 354 (N.D. Georgia, 1992)
10 case citations
Associated Container Transportation (Australia) Ltd. v. United States
705 F.2d 53 (Second Circuit, 1983)
9 case citations
United States v. GAF Corp.
449 F. Supp. 351 (S.D. New York, 1978)
8 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 87–664, §3, Sept. 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 548; Pub. L. 94–435, title I, §102, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1384; Pub. L. 96–349, §2(b)(1)–(3), Sept. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 1154; Pub. L. 103–438, §3(e)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4598.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
The International Antitrust Enforcement Assistance Act of 1994, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 103–438, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4597, which is classified principally to chapter 88 (§6201 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6201 of this title and Tables.
This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (c)(1)(B), (2) and (d), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 87–664, known as the Antitrust Civil Process Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1311 of this title and Tables.
Section 30 of this title, referred to in subsec. (i)(2), was repealed by Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title IV, §14102(f), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1922.

Amendments
1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–438 inserted "or, with respect to the International Antitrust Enforcement Assistance Act of 1994, an investigation authorized by section 3 of such Act" after "investigation" and "by the United States" after "proceeding".
1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–349, §2(b)(1), inserted provision for service and notice of a civil investigative demand for any product of discovery.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 96–349, §2(b)(2), inserted provision respecting time demand for product of discovery is returnable.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 96–349, §2(b)(3), designated existing provisions as par. (1), redesignated as cls. (A) and (B) former cls. (1) and (2), and added par. (2).
1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–435 struck out "under investigation" before "may be in possession", inserted "or may have any information" after "any documentary material", and inserted provision requiring the production of documentary material for inspection or reproduction, answers in writing to written interrogatories, the giving of oral testimony concerning documentary material or information, and the furnishing of any combination of such material, answers, or testimony.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–435 restructured subsec. (b) and as so restructured, in par. (1) inserted provisions of cl. (B), in par. (2), added cls. (B) and (C), in par. (3) substituted provisions relating to written interrogatories for provisions relating to prescription of a return date for demanded material, and in par. (4), substituted provisions relating to oral testimony for provisions requiring a demand to identify the custodian to whom demanded material shall be made available.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 94–435 inserted provision relating to the submission of answers to written interrogatories and the giving of oral testimony, struck out provisions of par. (1) relating to the reasonableness requirement for demands for documentary material, redesignated par. (2) as (1) and provided that protected status of any information or material would be determined by standards applicable in the case of a subpena or subpena duces tecum issued by a court of the United States, and added par. (2).
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 94–435 redesignated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 94–435 redesignated existing provisions as par. (1), inserted "return receipt requested" after "certified mail" in par. (C), and added par. (2).
Subsecs. (g) to (i). Pub. L. 94–435 added subsecs. (g) to (i).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1976 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 94–435 effective Sept. 30, 1976, except subsec. (i)(8) of this section effective Oct. 1, 1976, see section 106 of Pub. L. 94–435, set out as a note under section 1311 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 1312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/1312.