FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—THE PRINCIPAL REGISTER

Interference; declaration by Director

15 U.S.C. § 1066
Title15Commerce and Trade
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—THE PRINCIPAL REGISTER

This text of 15 U.S.C. § 1066 (Interference; declaration by Director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 1066.

Text

Upon petition showing extraordinary circumstances, the Director may declare that an interference exists when application is made for the registration of a mark which so resembles a mark previously registered by another, or for the registration of which another has previously made application, as to be likely when used on or in connection with the goods or services of the applicant to cause confusion or mistake or to deceive. No interference shall be declared between an application and the registration of a mark the right to the use of which has become incontestable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic Committee
483 U.S. 522 (Supreme Court, 1987)
519 case citations
Omega Importing Corp. v. Petri-Kine Camera Company, Inc.
451 F.2d 1190 (Second Circuit, 1971)
161 case citations
Lipton Industries, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.
670 F.2d 1024 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1982)
47 case citations
Money Store v. Harriscorp Finance, Inc.
689 F.2d 666 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
43 case citations
Rosenruist-Gestao E Servicos LDA v. Virgin Enterprises Ltd.
511 F.3d 437 (Fourth Circuit, 2007)
33 case citations
The Money Store v. Harriscorp Finance, Inc.
689 F.2d 666 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
29 case citations
Selfway, Inc. v. Travelers Petroleum, Inc.
579 F.2d 75 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1978)
14 case citations
Perfectform Corporation v. Perfect Brassiere Co., Inc.
256 F.2d 736 (Third Circuit, 1958)
11 case citations
Alfred Electronics v. Alford Manufacturing Company
333 F.2d 912 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1964)
10 case citations
Dynamet Technology, Inc. v. Dynamet Inc.
593 F.2d 1007 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1979)
4 case citations
Erlen Products Company v. The Toni Company (The Gillette Company, Assignee, Substituted)
251 F.2d 625 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1958)
1 case citations
Robert Hall Clothes, Inc. v. Commissioner of Patents
240 F. Supp. 376 (District of Columbia, 1965)

Source Credit

History

(July 5, 1946, ch. 540, title I, §16, 60 Stat. 434; Pub. L. 87–772, §11, Oct. 9, 1962, 76 Stat. 771; Pub. L. 97–247, §11, Aug. 27, 1982, 96 Stat. 321; Pub. L. 100–667, title I, §117, Nov. 16, 1988, 102 Stat. 3941; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(b)(1)(B)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–583.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Prior Provisions
Act Feb. 20, 1905, ch. 592, §7, 33 Stat. 726.

Amendments
1999—Pub. L. 106–113 substituted "Director" for "Commissioner".
1988—Pub. L. 100–667 substituted "used on or in connection with the goods or services" for "applied to the goods or when used in connection with the services".
1982—Pub. L. 97–247 substituted "Upon petition showing extraordinary circumstances, the Commissioner may declare that an interference exists when application is made for the registration of a mark which so resembles a mark previously registered by another, or for the registration of which another has previously made application, as to be likely when applied to the goods or when used in connection with the services of the applicant to cause confusion or mistake or to deceive" for "Whenever application is made for the registration of a mark which so resembles a mark previously registered by another, or for the registration of which another has previously made application, as to be likely when applied to the goods or when used in connection with the services of the applicant to cause confusion or mistake or to deceive, the Commissioner may declare that an interference exists".
1962—Pub. L. 87–772 struck out "purchasers" after "or to deceive".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of Title 35, Patents.

Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 100–667 effective one year after Nov. 16, 1988, see section 136 of Pub. L. 100–667, set out as a note under section 1051 of this title.

Effective Date of 1982 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–247 effective six months after Aug. 27, 1982, see section 17(c) of Pub. L. 97–247, set out as a note under section 294 of Title 35, Patents.

Repeal and Effect on Existing Rights
Repeal of inconsistent provisions, effect of this chapter on pending proceedings and existing registrations and rights under prior acts, see notes set out under section 1051 of this title.

Executive Documents

Transfer of Functions
For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of Commerce, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Commerce, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 5 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 1066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/1066.