FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 20
Declaration of policy
15 U.S.C. § 1011
Title15 — Commerce and Trade
Chapter20 — REGULATION OF INSURANCE
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 1011 (Declaration of policy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 1011.
Text
Congress hereby declares that the continued regulation and taxation by the several States of the business of insurance is in the public interest, and that silence on the part of the Congress shall not be construed to impose any barrier to the regulation or taxation of such business by the several States.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Riverview Health Institute LLC v. Medical Mutual of Ohio
601 F.3d 505 (Sixth Circuit, 2010)
Granholm v. Heald
544 U.S. 460 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran
536 U.S. 355 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Spirt v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n
691 F.2d 1054 (Second Circuit, 1982)
Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.
356 S.W.3d 421 (Texas Supreme Court, 2011)
Norfolk Southern Corp. v. Oberly
822 F.2d 388 (Third Circuit, 1987)
Debra C. Moran, and State of Illinois, Intervenor-Appellant v. Rush Prudential Hmo, Incorporated
230 F.3d 959 (Seventh Circuit, 2000)
Steinberg v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
224 F.R.D. 67 (E.D. New York, 2004)
Citizens of Humanity v. Applied Underwriters, Inc.
226 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 (California Court of Appeals, 5th District, 2017)
Nielsen Contracting, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters, Inc.
232 Cal. Rptr. 3d 282 (California Court of Appeals, 5th District, 2018)
Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Society v. Harris
740 So. 2d 362 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1999)
Fredericksburg Care Co. v. Lira
407 S.W.3d 810 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)
Idaho ex rel. Soward v. United States
858 F.2d 445 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Williamsburg Care Co. v. Acosta
406 S.W.3d 711 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)
First Penn-Pacific Life Insurance v. Evans
304 F.3d 345 (Fourth Circuit, 2002)
Merchants Home Delivery Service, Inc. v. Frank B. Hall & Co.
50 F.3d 1486 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Cathey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
764 S.W.2d 286 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Owensboro National Bank v. Stephens
44 F.3d 388 (Sixth Circuit, 1994)
Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Garamendi
790 F. Supp. 938 (N.D. California, 1992)
Norris v. Arizona Governing Committee for Tax Deferred Annuity
671 F.2d 330 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Source Credit
History
(Mar. 9, 1945, ch. 20, §1, 59 Stat. 33.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Short Title of 2021 Amendment
Pub. L. 116–327, §1, Jan. 13, 2021, 134 Stat. 5097, provided that: "This Act [amending section 1013 of this title and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 1013 of this title] may be cited as the 'Competitive Health Insurance Reform Act of 2020'."
Short Title
Act Mar. 9, 1945, ch. 20, 59 Stat. 33, which is classified to this chapter, is popularly known as the "McCarran-Ferguson Act".
Separability
Act Mar. 9, 1945, ch. 20, §6, 59 Stat. 34, provided: "If any provision of this Act [this chapter], or the application of such provision to any person or circumstances, shall be held invalid, the remainder of the Act, and the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected."
Short Title of 2021 Amendment
Pub. L. 116–327, §1, Jan. 13, 2021, 134 Stat. 5097, provided that: "This Act [amending section 1013 of this title and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 1013 of this title] may be cited as the 'Competitive Health Insurance Reform Act of 2020'."
Short Title
Act Mar. 9, 1945, ch. 20, 59 Stat. 33, which is classified to this chapter, is popularly known as the "McCarran-Ferguson Act".
Separability
Act Mar. 9, 1945, ch. 20, §6, 59 Stat. 34, provided: "If any provision of this Act [this chapter], or the application of such provision to any person or circumstances, shall be held invalid, the remainder of the Act, and the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/1011.