FEDERAL · 11 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—ADMINISTRATION
Petition and proceedings relating to petition
11 U.S.C. § 921
Title11 — Bankruptcy
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—ADMINISTRATION
This text of 11 U.S.C. § 921 (Petition and proceedings relating to petition) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
11 U.S.C. § 921.
Text
(a)Notwithstanding sections 109(d) and 301 of this title, a case under this chapter concerning an unincorporated tax or special assessment district that does not have such district's own officials is commenced by the filing under section 301 of this title of a petition under this chapter by such district's governing authority or the board or body having authority to levy taxes or assessments to meet the obligations of such district.
(b)The chief judge of the court of appeals for the circuit embracing the district in which the case is commenced shall designate the bankruptcy judge to conduct the case.
(c)After any objection to the petition, the court, after notice and a hearing, may dismiss the petition if the debtor did not file the petition in good faith or if the petition does not mee
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re: Ronald M. Tamecki, Sr., Debtor Ronald M. Tamecki, Sr. v. Lawrence G. Frank
229 F.3d 205 (Third Circuit, 2000)
In Re Glunk
342 B.R. 717 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2006)
In re City of Detroit
524 B.R. 147 (E.D. Michigan, 2014)
In Re Sullivan County Regional Refuse Disposal District
165 B.R. 60 (D. New Hampshire, 1994)
In Re Salazar
339 B.R. 622 (S.D. Texas, 2006)
In Re Valley Health System
383 B.R. 156 (C.D. California, 2008)
In Re New York City Off-Track Betting Corp.
427 B.R. 256 (S.D. New York, 2010)
In Re Villages at Castle Rock Metropolitan District No. 4
145 B.R. 76 (D. Colorado, 1990)
In re City of Stockton
493 B.R. 772 (E.D. California, 2013)
In Re Town of Westlake, Texas
211 B.R. 860 (N.D. Texas, 1997)
In Re Pleasant View Utility District of Cheatham County
24 B.R. 632 (M.D. Tennessee, 1982)
Del Rio Development Inc. v. First Liberty Financial, Inc. (In Re Del Rio Development Inc.)
35 B.R. 127 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
City of Central Falls v. Central Falls Teachers' Union, Rhode Island Council 94, Local 1627
468 B.R. 36 (D. Rhode Island, 2012)
Newberry v. City of San Bernardino (In re City of San Bernardino)
558 B.R. 321 (C.D. California, 2016)
In Re City of Harrisburg, Pa
465 B.R. 744 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 2011)
In re Suffolk Regional Offtrack Betting Corp.
462 B.R. 397 (E.D. New York, 2011)
In Re Westport Transit District
165 B.R. 93 (D. Connecticut, 1994)
Pope v. Haas & Wilkerson, Inc. (In Re Alabama State Fair Authority)
232 B.R. 252 (N.D. Alabama, 1999)
In Re Slocum Lake Drainage District of Lake County
336 B.R. 387 (N.D. Illinois, 2006)
California Public Employees' Retirement System v. City of San Bernardino
260 F. Supp. 3d 1216 (C.D. California, 2013)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2622; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §494, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 383; Pub. L. 109–8, title V, §501(a), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 118.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
legislative statements
Section 905 of the Senate amendment is incorporated as section 921(b) of the House amendment with the difference that the chief judge of the circuit embracing the district in which the case is commenced designates a bankruptcy judge to conduct the case in lieu of a district judge as under present law. It is intended that a municipality may commence a case in any district in which the municipality is located, as under present law. Section 906 of the Senate amendment has been adopted in substance in section 109(c) of the House amendment.
senate report no. 95–989
Section 905 [enacted as section 921(b)] adopts the procedures for selection of the judge for the chapter 9 case as found in current section 82(d) [section 402(d) of former title 11]. It is expected that the large chapter 9 case might take up almost all the judicial time of the presiding judge and involve very complex legal questions. Selection should not be left to chance or the luck of the draw. This provision will insure that calendar demands and levels of experience can be considered in the selection of the judge in a chapter 9 case.
house report no. 95–595
Subsection (a) is derived from section 85(a) [section 405(a) of former title 11], second sentence, of current law. There is no substantive change in the law. The subsection permits a municipality that does not have its own officers to be moved into chapter 9 by the action of the body or board that has authority to levy taxes for the municipality.
Subsection (b) permits a party in interest to object to the filing of the petition not later than 15 days after notice. This provision tracks the third sentence of section 85(a) [section 405(a) of former title 11], except that the provision for publication in section 85(a) is left to the Rules (see Rule 9–14), and therefore the determinative date is left less definite.
Subsection (c) permits the court to dismiss a petition not filed in good faith or not filed in compliance with the requirements of the chapter. This provision is the fourth sentence of section 85(a) [section 405(a) of former title 11].
Subsection (d) directs the court to order relief on the petition if it does not dismiss the case under subsection (c).
Subsection (e) contains the fifth and sixth sentences of section 85(a) [section 405(a) of former title 11].
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2005—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 109–8 inserted "notwithstanding section 301(b)" before period at end.
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–353, §494(c), substituted "109(d)" for "109(c)".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98–353, §494(a), substituted "any" for "an", and "petition if the debtor did not file the petition in good faith" for "petition, if the debtor did not file the petition in good faith,".
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 98–353, §494(b), (d), redesignated subsec. (e) as (d) and substituted "subsection (c)" for "subsection (d)". No former subsec. (d) had been enacted.
Subsecs. (e), (f). Pub. L. 98–353, §494(b), redesignated subsec. (f) as (e). Former subsec. (e) redesignated (d).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2005 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
legislative statements
Section 905 of the Senate amendment is incorporated as section 921(b) of the House amendment with the difference that the chief judge of the circuit embracing the district in which the case is commenced designates a bankruptcy judge to conduct the case in lieu of a district judge as under present law. It is intended that a municipality may commence a case in any district in which the municipality is located, as under present law. Section 906 of the Senate amendment has been adopted in substance in section 109(c) of the House amendment.
senate report no. 95–989
Section 905 [enacted as section 921(b)] adopts the procedures for selection of the judge for the chapter 9 case as found in current section 82(d) [section 402(d) of former title 11]. It is expected that the large chapter 9 case might take up almost all the judicial time of the presiding judge and involve very complex legal questions. Selection should not be left to chance or the luck of the draw. This provision will insure that calendar demands and levels of experience can be considered in the selection of the judge in a chapter 9 case.
house report no. 95–595
Subsection (a) is derived from section 85(a) [section 405(a) of former title 11], second sentence, of current law. There is no substantive change in the law. The subsection permits a municipality that does not have its own officers to be moved into chapter 9 by the action of the body or board that has authority to levy taxes for the municipality.
Subsection (b) permits a party in interest to object to the filing of the petition not later than 15 days after notice. This provision tracks the third sentence of section 85(a) [section 405(a) of former title 11], except that the provision for publication in section 85(a) is left to the Rules (see Rule 9–14), and therefore the determinative date is left less definite.
Subsection (c) permits the court to dismiss a petition not filed in good faith or not filed in compliance with the requirements of the chapter. This provision is the fourth sentence of section 85(a) [section 405(a) of former title 11].
Subsection (d) directs the court to order relief on the petition if it does not dismiss the case under subsection (c).
Subsection (e) contains the fifth and sixth sentences of section 85(a) [section 405(a) of former title 11].
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2005—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 109–8 inserted "notwithstanding section 301(b)" before period at end.
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–353, §494(c), substituted "109(d)" for "109(c)".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98–353, §494(a), substituted "any" for "an", and "petition if the debtor did not file the petition in good faith" for "petition, if the debtor did not file the petition in good faith,".
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 98–353, §494(b), (d), redesignated subsec. (e) as (d) and substituted "subsection (c)" for "subsection (d)". No former subsec. (d) had been enacted.
Subsecs. (e), (f). Pub. L. 98–353, §494(b), redesignated subsec. (f) as (e). Former subsec. (e) redesignated (d).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2005 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 U.S.C. § 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/11/921.