FEDERAL · 11 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Limitation on jurisdiction and powers of court

11 U.S.C. § 904
Title11Bankruptcy
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

This text of 11 U.S.C. § 904 (Limitation on jurisdiction and powers of court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
11 U.S.C. § 904.

Text

Notwithstanding any power of the court, unless the debtor consents or the plan so provides, the court may not, by any stay, order, or decree, in the case or otherwise, interfere with—

(1)any of the political or governmental powers of the debtor;
(2)any of the property or revenues of the debtor; or
(3)the debtor's use or enjoyment of any income-producing property.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sylvia Evans, Administrator of the Estate of Andrew Evans v. City of Chicago
10 F.3d 474 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)
82 case citations
Lyda v. City of Detroit, Mich. (In Re City of Detroit, Mich.)
841 F.3d 684 (Sixth Circuit, 2016)
44 case citations
In re City of Detroit
524 B.R. 147 (E.D. Michigan, 2014)
24 case citations
In Re Addison Community Hospital Authority
175 B.R. 646 (E.D. Michigan, 1994)
16 case citations
In re Jefferson County
474 B.R. 228 (N.D. Alabama, 2012)
13 case citations
In Re New York City Off-Track Betting Corp.
434 B.R. 131 (S.D. New York, 2010)
10 case citations
In re City of Stockton
486 B.R. 194 (E.D. California, 2013)
5 case citations
In Re Barnwell County Hospital
459 B.R. 903 (D. South Carolina, 2011)
5 case citations
Unionbancal Corporation & Subsidiaries v. United States
113 Fed. Cl. 117 (Federal Claims, 2013)
5 case citations
In re City of Stockton, California
499 B.R. 802 (E.D. California, 2013)
3 case citations
In Re Castle Pines North Metropolitan District
129 B.R. 233 (D. Colorado, 1991)
3 case citations
In Re Jefferson County, Ala.
465 B.R. 243 (N.D. Alabama, 2012)
2 case citations
In re Hardeman County Hospital District
540 B.R. 229 (N.D. Texas, 2015)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2622.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes

senate report no. 95–989
This section adopts the policy of section 82(c) of current law [section 402(c) of former title 11]. The only change in this section from section 82(c) is to conform the section to the style and cross-references of S. 2266.

house report no. 95–595
This section adopts the policy of section 82(c) of current law [section 402(c) of former title 11]. The Usery case underlines the need for this limitation on the court's powers. The only change in this section from section 82(c) is to conform the section to the style and cross-references of H.R. 8200. This section makes clear that the court may not interfere with the choices a municipality makes as to what services and benefits it will provide to its inhabitants.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1984—Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §493, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 383, substituted "SUBCHAPTER" for "SUBCHAPER".

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 U.S.C. § 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/11/904.