FEDERAL · 11 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS
Limitation on jurisdiction and powers of court
11 U.S.C. § 904
Title11 — Bankruptcy
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS
This text of 11 U.S.C. § 904 (Limitation on jurisdiction and powers of court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
11 U.S.C. § 904.
Text
Notwithstanding any power of the court, unless the debtor consents or the plan so provides, the court may not, by any stay, order, or decree, in the case or otherwise, interfere with—
(1)any of the political or governmental powers of the debtor;
(2)any of the property or revenues of the debtor; or
(3)the debtor's use or enjoyment of any income-producing property.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sylvia Evans, Administrator of the Estate of Andrew Evans v. City of Chicago
10 F.3d 474 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)
Assured Guaranty Corp. v. Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for Puerto Rico (In Re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for Puerto Rico)
919 F.3d 121 (First Circuit, 2019)
Lyda v. City of Detroit, Mich. (In Re City of Detroit, Mich.)
841 F.3d 684 (Sixth Circuit, 2016)
In re City of Detroit
524 B.R. 147 (E.D. Michigan, 2014)
Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. v. Commonwealth (In Re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for Puerto Rico)
919 F.3d 638 (First Circuit, 2019)
Association of Retired Employees v. City of Stockton (In re City of Stockton)
478 B.R. 8 (E.D. California, 2012)
In Re Addison Community Hospital Authority
175 B.R. 646 (E.D. Michigan, 1994)
In re Jefferson County
474 B.R. 228 (N.D. Alabama, 2012)
In Re New York City Off-Track Betting Corp.
434 B.R. 131 (S.D. New York, 2010)
Prime Healthcare Management, Inc. v. Valley Health System (In Re Valley Health System)
429 B.R. 692 (C.D. California, 2010)
In re City of Stockton
486 B.R. 194 (E.D. California, 2013)
In Re Barnwell County Hospital
459 B.R. 903 (D. South Carolina, 2011)
Unionbancal Corporation & Subsidiaries v. United States
113 Fed. Cl. 117 (Federal Claims, 2013)
Ambac Assurance Corp. v. Commonwealth (In Re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for Puerto Rico)
927 F.3d 597 (First Circuit, 2019)
In re City of Stockton, California
499 B.R. 802 (E.D. California, 2013)
In Re Castle Pines North Metropolitan District
129 B.R. 233 (D. Colorado, 1991)
In Re Jefferson County, Ala.
465 B.R. 243 (N.D. Alabama, 2012)
In re Hardeman County Hospital District
540 B.R. 229 (N.D. Texas, 2015)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2622.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
senate report no. 95–989
This section adopts the policy of section 82(c) of current law [section 402(c) of former title 11]. The only change in this section from section 82(c) is to conform the section to the style and cross-references of S. 2266.
house report no. 95–595
This section adopts the policy of section 82(c) of current law [section 402(c) of former title 11]. The Usery case underlines the need for this limitation on the court's powers. The only change in this section from section 82(c) is to conform the section to the style and cross-references of H.R. 8200. This section makes clear that the court may not interfere with the choices a municipality makes as to what services and benefits it will provide to its inhabitants.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1984—Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §493, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 383, substituted "SUBCHAPTER" for "SUBCHAPER".
senate report no. 95–989
This section adopts the policy of section 82(c) of current law [section 402(c) of former title 11]. The only change in this section from section 82(c) is to conform the section to the style and cross-references of S. 2266.
house report no. 95–595
This section adopts the policy of section 82(c) of current law [section 402(c) of former title 11]. The Usery case underlines the need for this limitation on the court's powers. The only change in this section from section 82(c) is to conform the section to the style and cross-references of H.R. 8200. This section makes clear that the court may not interfere with the choices a municipality makes as to what services and benefits it will provide to its inhabitants.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1984—Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §493, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 383, substituted "SUBCHAPTER" for "SUBCHAPER".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 U.S.C. § 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/11/904.