FEDERAL · 11 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IV—COMMODITY BROKER LIQUIDATION
Voidable transfers
11 U.S.C. § 764
Title11 — Bankruptcy
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IV—COMMODITY BROKER LIQUIDATION
This text of 11 U.S.C. § 764 (Voidable transfers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
11 U.S.C. § 764.
Text
(a)Except as otherwise provided in this section, any transfer by the debtor of property that, but for such transfer, would have been customer property, may be avoided by the trustee, and such property shall be treated as customer property, if and to the extent that the trustee avoids such transfer under section 544, 545, 547, 548, 549, or 724(a) of this title. For the purpose of such sections, the property so transferred shall be deemed to have been property of the debtor, and, if such transfer was made to a customer or for a customer's benefit, such customer shall be deemed, for the purposes of this section, to have been a creditor.
(b)Notwithstanding sections 544, 545, 547, 548, 549, and 724(a) of this title, the trustee may not avoid a transfer made before seven days after the order f
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc.
583 U.S. 366 (Supreme Court, 2018)
Kaiser Steel Corp v. Pearl Brewing Co.
952 F.2d 1230 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)
Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Charles Schwab & Co.
913 F.2d 846 (Tenth Circuit, 1990)
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Asea Brown Boveri, Inc. (In Re Grand Eagle Companies, Inc.)
288 B.R. 484 (N.D. Ohio, 2003)
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of National Forge Co. v. Clark (In Re National Forge Co.)
344 B.R. 340 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 2006)
QSI Holdings, Inc. v. Alford
382 B.R. 731 (W.D. Michigan, 2007)
In Re Record Club of America
38 B.R. 691 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1983)
KSC Recovery, Inc. v. First Boston Corp. (In Re Kaiser Merger Litigation)
168 B.R. 991 (D. Colorado, 1994)
Bodenstein v. Univ. of N. Iowa (In re Peregrine Fin. Grp., Inc.)
589 B.R. 360 (N.D. Illinois, 2018)
In Re Emergency Beacon Corp.
84 B.R. 329 (S.D. New York, 1988)
Nos. 90-1243, 90-1245
952 F.2d 1230 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2618; Pub. L. 97–222, §17, July 27, 1982, 96 Stat. 240; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §487, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 383; Pub. L. 111–16, §2(9), May 7, 2009, 123 Stat. 1607.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
legislative statements
Section 764 of the House amendment is derived from the House bill.
senate report no. 95–989
Section 764 permits the trustee to void any transfer of property that, except for such transfer, would have been customer property, to the extent permitted under section 544, 545, 547, 548, 549, or 724(a).
house report no. 95–595
Section 764 indicates the extent to which the avoiding powers may be used by the trustee under subchapter IV of chapter 7. If property recovered would have been customer property if never transferred, then subsection (a) indicates that it will be so treated when recovered.
Subsection (b) prohibits avoiding any transaction that occurs before or within five days after the petition if the transaction is approved by the Commission and concerns an open contractual commitment. This enables the Commission to exercise its discretion to protect the integrity of the market by insuring that transactions cleared with other brokers will not be undone on a preference or a fraudulent transfer theory.
Subsection (c) insulates variation margin payments and other deposits from the avoiding powers except to the extent of actual fraud under section 548(a)(1). This facilitates prepetition transfers and protects the ordinary course of business in the market.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2009—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–16 substituted "seven days" for "five days" in introductory provisions.
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–353 substituted "any transfer by the debtor" for "any transfer".
1982—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–222, §17(a), substituted "but" for "except", inserted "such property" after "trustee, and", and substituted "shall be" for "is" wherever appearing.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–222, §17(b), substituted "order for relief" for "date of the filing of the petition".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 97–222, §17(c), struck out subsec. (c) which provided that the trustee could not avoid a transfer that was a margin payment to or deposit with a commodity broker or forward contract merchant or was a settlement payment made by a clearing organization and that occurred before the commencement of the case.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2009 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 111–16 effective Dec. 1, 2009, see section 7 of Pub. L. 111–16, set out as a note under section 109 of this title.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
legislative statements
Section 764 of the House amendment is derived from the House bill.
senate report no. 95–989
Section 764 permits the trustee to void any transfer of property that, except for such transfer, would have been customer property, to the extent permitted under section 544, 545, 547, 548, 549, or 724(a).
house report no. 95–595
Section 764 indicates the extent to which the avoiding powers may be used by the trustee under subchapter IV of chapter 7. If property recovered would have been customer property if never transferred, then subsection (a) indicates that it will be so treated when recovered.
Subsection (b) prohibits avoiding any transaction that occurs before or within five days after the petition if the transaction is approved by the Commission and concerns an open contractual commitment. This enables the Commission to exercise its discretion to protect the integrity of the market by insuring that transactions cleared with other brokers will not be undone on a preference or a fraudulent transfer theory.
Subsection (c) insulates variation margin payments and other deposits from the avoiding powers except to the extent of actual fraud under section 548(a)(1). This facilitates prepetition transfers and protects the ordinary course of business in the market.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2009—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–16 substituted "seven days" for "five days" in introductory provisions.
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–353 substituted "any transfer by the debtor" for "any transfer".
1982—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–222, §17(a), substituted "but" for "except", inserted "such property" after "trustee, and", and substituted "shall be" for "is" wherever appearing.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–222, §17(b), substituted "order for relief" for "date of the filing of the petition".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 97–222, §17(c), struck out subsec. (c) which provided that the trustee could not avoid a transfer that was a margin payment to or deposit with a commodity broker or forward contract merchant or was a settlement payment made by a clearing organization and that occurred before the commencement of the case.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2009 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 111–16 effective Dec. 1, 2009, see section 7 of Pub. L. 111–16, set out as a note under section 109 of this title.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 U.S.C. § 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/11/764.