FEDERAL · 11 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—COMMENCEMENT OF A CASE
Joint cases
11 U.S.C. § 302
Title11 — Bankruptcy
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—COMMENCEMENT OF A CASE
This text of 11 U.S.C. § 302 (Joint cases) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
11 U.S.C. § 302.
Text
(a)A joint case under a chapter of this title is commenced by the filing with the bankruptcy court of a single petition under such chapter by an individual that may be a debtor under such chapter and such individual's spouse. The commencement of a joint case under a chapter of this title constitutes an order for relief under such chapter.
(b)After the commencement of a joint case, the court shall determine the extent, if any, to which the debtors' estates shall be consolidated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,524 in Re Cloyd W. Devers and Barbara Devers, Debtors. Cloyd W. Devers and Barbara Devers v. Bank of Sheridan, Montana
759 F.2d 751 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
In Re Elna Kay Brooks, Debtor. Nancy James, Trustee v. Washington Mutual Savings Bank
871 F.2d 89 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
Ageton v. Cervenka (In Re Ageton)
14 B.R. 833 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
Netherton v. Baker (In Re Baker)
205 B.R. 125 (N.D. Illinois, 1997)
In Re Kevin J. Doser in Re Laura E. Doser, Judith M. Scott v. United States Trustee
412 F.3d 1056 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Matter of Howard
6 B.R. 220 (S.D. Ohio, 1980)
In Re O'Malley
252 B.R. 451 (N.D. Illinois, 1999)
Matter of Stuart
31 B.R. 18 (D. Connecticut, 1983)
United State ex rel. Minge v. Hawker Beechcraft Corp. (In re Hawker Beechcraft, Inc.)
515 B.R. 416 (S.D. New York, 2014)
Pedersen v. Office of Personnel Management
881 F. Supp. 2d 294 (D. Connecticut, 2012)
In Re Williams
17 B.R. 204 (W.D. Kentucky, 1982)
Hunt v. TRC Properties, Inc. (In Re Hunt)
160 B.R. 131 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
In Re Delray Associates Ltd. Partnership
212 B.R. 511 (D. Maryland, 1997)
In Re Janesofsky
22 B.R. 973 (D. Colorado, 1982)
Bli Farms v. GreenStone Farm Credit Services (In Re Bli Farms)
312 B.R. 606 (E.D. Michigan, 2004)
In Re Koliba
338 B.R. 39 (N.D. Ohio, 2006)
Zimmerman v. Itano Farms, Inc. (In Re Currey)
144 B.R. 490 (D. Idaho, 1992)
In Re Lam
98 B.R. 965 (W.D. Missouri, 1988)
In re Villaverde
540 B.R. 431 (C.D. California, 2015)
Stancil v. Bradley Investments, LLC (In re Stancil)
473 B.R. 478 (District of Columbia, 2012)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2558.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
senate report no. 95–989
A joint case is a voluntary bankruptcy case concerning a wife and husband. Under current law, there is no explicit provision for joint cases. Very often, however, in the consumer debtor context, a husband and wife are jointly liable on their debts, and jointly hold most of their property. A joint case will facilitate consolidation of their estates, to the benefit of both the debtors and their creditors, because the cost of administration will be reduced, and there will be only one filing fee.
Section 302 specifies that a joint case is commenced by the filing of a petition under an appropriate chapter by an individual and that individual's spouse. Thus, one spouse cannot take the other into bankruptcy without the other's knowledge or consent. The filing of the petition constitutes an order for relief under the chapter selected.
Subsection (b) requires the court to determine the extent, if any, to which the estates of the two debtors will be consolidated; that is, assets and liabilities combined in a single pool to pay creditors. Factors that will be relevant in the court's determination include the extent of jointly held property and the amount of jointly-owned debts. The section, of course, is not license to consolidate in order to avoid other provisions of the title to the detriment of either the debtors or their creditors. It is designed mainly for ease of administration.
senate report no. 95–989
A joint case is a voluntary bankruptcy case concerning a wife and husband. Under current law, there is no explicit provision for joint cases. Very often, however, in the consumer debtor context, a husband and wife are jointly liable on their debts, and jointly hold most of their property. A joint case will facilitate consolidation of their estates, to the benefit of both the debtors and their creditors, because the cost of administration will be reduced, and there will be only one filing fee.
Section 302 specifies that a joint case is commenced by the filing of a petition under an appropriate chapter by an individual and that individual's spouse. Thus, one spouse cannot take the other into bankruptcy without the other's knowledge or consent. The filing of the petition constitutes an order for relief under the chapter selected.
Subsection (b) requires the court to determine the extent, if any, to which the estates of the two debtors will be consolidated; that is, assets and liabilities combined in a single pool to pay creditors. Factors that will be relevant in the court's determination include the extent of jointly held property and the amount of jointly-owned debts. The section, of course, is not license to consolidate in order to avoid other provisions of the title to the detriment of either the debtors or their creditors. It is designed mainly for ease of administration.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 U.S.C. § 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/11/302.