FEDERAL · 11 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—OFFICERS AND ADMINISTRATION
Claims and interests
11 U.S.C. § 1111
Title11 — Bankruptcy
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—OFFICERS AND ADMINISTRATION
This text of 11 U.S.C. § 1111 (Claims and interests) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
11 U.S.C. § 1111.
Text
(b)(1)(A) A claim secured by a lien on property of the estate shall be allowed or disallowed under section 502 of this title the same as if the holder of such claim had recourse against the debtor on account of such claim, whether or not such holder has such recourse, unless—
(i)the class of which such claim is a part elects, by at least two-thirds in amount and more than half in number of allowed claims of such class, application of paragraph (2) of this subsection; or
(ii)such holder does not have such recou
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. Partnership
507 U.S. 380 (Supreme Court, 1993)
National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco
465 U.S. 513 (Supreme Court, 1984)
In the Matter of Greystone III Joint Venture, Debtor. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Greystone III Joint Venture
995 F.2d 1274 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
In Re South Atlantic Financial Corp., Etc., Debtors. Biscayne 21 Condominium Association, Inc. v. South Atlantic Financial Corp., Etc.
767 F.2d 814 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
In Re Lamar Dewsnup and Aletha Dewsnup, Debtors. Lamar Dewsnup, Aletha Dewsnup v. Louis L. Timm
908 F.2d 588 (Tenth Circuit, 1990)
First Union Mortgage Corp. v. Eubanks (In Re Eubanks)
1998 FED App. 0011P (Sixth Circuit, 1998)
In Re Vertientes, Ltd., Debtor. Vertientes, Ltd. v. Internor Trade, Inc.
845 F.2d 57 (Third Circuit, 1988)
In Re Paul Weldon Herd, Debtor. Rowe International, Inc. v. Paul Weldon Herd
840 F.2d 757 (Tenth Circuit, 1988)
In re Fesco Plastics Corp.
996 F.2d 152 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)
North Central Development Co. v. Landmark Capital Co. (In Re Landmark Capital Co.)
27 B.R. 273 (D. Arizona, 1983)
In Re Crouthamel Potato Chip Company, (Debtor). Appeal of Local 1092, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio
786 F.2d 141 (Third Circuit, 1986)
Crocker National Bank v. American Mariner Industries, Inc. (In Re American Mariner Industries, Inc.)
27 B.R. 1004 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
In Re Scruggs
342 B.R. 571 (E.D. Arkansas, 2006)
Taffi v. United States (In Re Taffi)
144 B.R. 105 (C.D. California, 1992)
Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Rite Autotronics Corp. (In Re Rite Autotronics Corp.)
27 B.R. 599 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
40 Collier bankr.cas.2d 787, Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,763 in the Matter of William L. Greenig and Troy W. Greenig, Debtors-Appellees. Appeal of United Feeds, Incorporated, Creditor
152 F.3d 631 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)
First Southern National Bank v. Sunnyslope Housing Ltd. Partnership
859 F.3d 637 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. Greystone III Joint Venture
948 F.2d 134 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)
JE Livestock, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re JE Livestock, Inc.)
375 B.R. 892 (Tenth Circuit, 2007)
Travelers Insurance Co. v. Bryson Properties XVIII (In Re Bryson Properties XVIII)
129 B.R. 440 (M.D. North Carolina, 1991)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2630; Pub. L. 111–327, §2(a)(32), Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3561.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
legislative statements
A discussion of section 1111(b) of the House amendment is best considered in the context of confirmation and will therefore, be discussed in connection with section 1129.
senate report no. 95–989
This section dispenses with the need for every creditor and equity security holder to file a proof of claim or interest in a reorganization case. Usually the debtor's schedules are accurate enough that they will suffice to determine the claims or interests allowable in the case. Thus, the section specifies that any claim or interest included on the debtor's schedules is deemed filed under section 501. This does not apply to claims or interests that are scheduled as disputed, contingent, or unliquidated.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2010—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–327 substituted "521(a)(1)" for "521(1)".
legislative statements
A discussion of section 1111(b) of the House amendment is best considered in the context of confirmation and will therefore, be discussed in connection with section 1129.
senate report no. 95–989
This section dispenses with the need for every creditor and equity security holder to file a proof of claim or interest in a reorganization case. Usually the debtor's schedules are accurate enough that they will suffice to determine the claims or interests allowable in the case. Thus, the section specifies that any claim or interest included on the debtor's schedules is deemed filed under section 501. This does not apply to claims or interests that are scheduled as disputed, contingent, or unliquidated.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2010—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–327 substituted "521(a)(1)" for "521(1)".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 U.S.C. § 1111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/11/1111.