FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER X—PUNITIVE ARTICLES
Art. 94. Mutiny or sedition
10 U.S.C. § 894
Title10 — Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER X—PUNITIVE ARTICLES
This text of 10 U.S.C. § 894 (Art. 94. Mutiny or sedition) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 894.
Text
(a)Any person subject to this chapter who—
(1)with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuses, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;
(2)with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or other disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition;
(3)fails to do his utmost to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition being committed in his presence, or fails to take all reasonable means to inform his superior commissioned officer or commanding officer of a mutiny or sedition which he knows or has reason to believe is taking place, is guilty of a failure to suppress or report a mut
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jeffers v. United States
432 U.S. 137 (Supreme Court, 1977)
United States v. Brown
45 M.J. 389 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1996)
United States v. Spicer
71 M.J. 470 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2013)
United States v. Crossley
10 M.J. 376 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1981)
United States v. Woolbright
12 C.M.A. 450 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1961)
United States v. Kinsch
54 M.J. 641 (Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2000)
United States v. Gay
16 M.J. 586 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1983)
United States v. Herd
29 M.J. 702 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1989)
Roland E. Simcox v. Paul J. Madigan, Warden, Federal Penitentiary, Alcatraz, California
298 F.2d 742 (Ninth Circuit, 1962)
Perovitz v. Perovitz
490 P.2d 320 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1971)
United States v. Lillian P. Hoffart, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles P. Hoffart, Deceased
256 F.2d 186 (Eighth Circuit, 1958)
United States v. Dorgan
157 F. Supp. 864 (D. Maine, 1958)
United States v. Sanchez
40 M.J. 508 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1994)
United States v. Brown
19 C.M.A. 591 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Pete
39 M.J. 521 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1994)
Miller v. Lehman
603 F. Supp. 164 (District of Columbia, 1985)
United States v. Schoensee
164 F. Supp. 784 (S.D. West Virginia, 1958)
Stoltz v. Commonwealth
831 S.E.2d 164 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 2019)
United States v. Wilson
19 C.M.A. 498 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Inmate JAMAAL LEWIS
(Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2014)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 68.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (a)(1) and (2), the words "or persons" are omitted, since, under section 1 of title 1, words importing the singular may apply to several persons.
In subsection (a)(3), the word "a" is substituted for the words "an offense of". The words "commissioned officer" are inserted after the word "superior", for clarity.
In subsection (a)(3), the word "a" is substituted for the words "an offense of". The words "commissioned officer" are inserted after the word "superior", for clarity.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/894.