FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IX—POST-TRIAL PROCEDURE AND REVIEW OF COURTS-MARTIAL
Art. 74. Remission and suspension
10 U.S.C. § 874
Title10 — Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IX—POST-TRIAL PROCEDURE AND REVIEW OF COURTS-MARTIAL
This text of 10 U.S.C. § 874 (Art. 74. Remission and suspension) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 874.
Text
(a)The Secretary concerned and, when designated by him, any Under Secretary, Assistant Secretary, Judge Advocate General, or commanding officer may remit or suspend any part or amount of the unexecuted part of any sentence, including all uncollected forfeitures other than a sentence approved by the President. However, in the case of a sentence of confinement for life without eligibility for parole that is adjudged for an offense committed after October 29, 2000, after the sentence is ordered executed, the authority of the Secretary concerned under the preceding sentence (1) may not be delegated, and (2) may be exercised only after the service of a period of confinement of not less than 20 years.
(b)The Secretary concerned may, for good cause, substitute an administrative form of discharg
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Healy
26 M.J. 394 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1988)
United States v. Humphries
71 M.J. 209 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2012)
Denedo v. United States
66 M.J. 114 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2008)
Brown v. McNamara
387 F.2d 150 (Third Circuit, 1967)
United States v. Hutchins
72 M.J. 294 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2013)
United States v. Miller
8 C.M.A. 33 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
Loving v. United States
68 M.J. 1 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2009)
United States v. Williams
21 C.M.A. 292 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1972)
Robert G. Gallagher v. Robert E. Quinn, Judges of the United States Court of Militaryappeals
363 F.2d 301 (D.C. Circuit, 1966)
United States v. Mills
12 M.J. 1 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1981)
United States v. Walter
8 C.M.A. 50 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
United States v. Sessions
10 C.M.A. 383 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1959)
United States v. Kreutzer
70 M.J. 444 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2012)
United States v. Kraffa
11 M.J. 453 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1981)
Johnson v. United States
19 C.M.A. 407 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Gilbreath
57 M.J. 57 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2002)
United States v. Martin
9 C.M.A. 84 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
United States v. Castleman
10 M.J. 750 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1981)
United States v. Johnson
15 M.J. 676 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1983)
United States v. McElwee
16 C.M.A. 586 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1967)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 63; Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title V, §553(a)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–125; Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title X, §1048(a)(8), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1223.)
Editorial Notes
In subsections (a) and (b), the words "Secretary concerned" are substituted for the words "Secretary of the Department".
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2001—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–107 inserted "that is adjudged for an offense committed after October 29, 2000" after "a sentence of confinement for life without eligibility for parole".
2000—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–398 inserted at end "However, in the case of a sentence of confinement for life without eligibility for parole, after the sentence is ordered executed, the authority of the Secretary concerned under the preceding sentence (1) may not be delegated, and (2) may be exercised only after the service of a period of confinement of not less than 20 years."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2000 Amendment
Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title V, §553(b)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–125, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall not apply with respect to a sentence of confinement for life without eligibility for parole that is adjudged for an offense committed before the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 30, 2000]."
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2001—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–107 inserted "that is adjudged for an offense committed after October 29, 2000" after "a sentence of confinement for life without eligibility for parole".
2000—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–398 inserted at end "However, in the case of a sentence of confinement for life without eligibility for parole, after the sentence is ordered executed, the authority of the Secretary concerned under the preceding sentence (1) may not be delegated, and (2) may be exercised only after the service of a period of confinement of not less than 20 years."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2000 Amendment
Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title V, §553(b)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–125, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall not apply with respect to a sentence of confinement for life without eligibility for parole that is adjudged for an offense committed before the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 30, 2000]."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/874.