FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER VII—TRIAL PROCEDURE
Art. 50a. Defense of lack of mental responsibility
10 U.S.C. § 850a
Title10 — Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER VII—TRIAL PROCEDURE
This text of 10 U.S.C. § 850a (Art. 50a. Defense of lack of mental responsibility) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 850a.
Text
(a)It is an affirmative defense in a trial by court-martial that, at the time of the commission of the acts constituting the offense, the accused, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, was unable to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness of the acts. Mental disease or defect does not otherwise constitute a defense.
(b)The accused has the burden of proving the defense of lack of mental responsibility by clear and convincing evidence.
(c)Whenever lack of mental responsibility of the accused with respect to an offense is properly at issue, the military judge shall instruct the members of the court as to the defense of lack of mental responsibility under this section and charge them to find the accused—
(1)guilty;
(2)not guilty; or
(3)not guilty only by reason
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Kreutzer
61 M.J. 293 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2005)
United States v. Gray
51 M.J. 1 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1999)
United States v. Murphy
50 M.J. 4 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1998)
United States v. Curtis
44 M.J. 106 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1996)
United States v. Shaw
64 M.J. 460 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2007)
Ellis v. Jacob
26 M.J. 90 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1988)
United States v. Meeks
41 M.J. 150 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1994)
United States v. Martin
56 M.J. 97 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2001)
United States v. Mott
72 M.J. 319 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2013)
United States v. Smith
36 M.J. 455 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1993)
United States v. Massey
27 M.J. 371 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1989)
United States v. Berri
33 M.J. 337 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1991)
United States v. Lilly
25 M.J. 403 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1988)
United States v. Riddle
67 M.J. 335 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2009)
United States v. Van Tassel
38 M.J. 91 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1993)
United States v. Collins
60 M.J. 261 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2004)
United States v. Cosner
35 M.J. 278 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1992)
United States v. Gardner
35 M.J. 300 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1992)
United States v. Major CARL W. AXELSON, JR.
65 M.J. 501 (Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2007)
United States v. Logan
31 M.J. 910 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1990)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title VIII, §802(a)(1), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3905; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LVII, §5233, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2915.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2016—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–328, in introductory provisions, struck out ", or the president of a court-martial without a military judge," after "the military judge".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
Effective Date
Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title VIII, §802(b), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3906, provided that: "Section 850a of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(1), shall apply only to offenses committed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 14, 1986]."
Amendments
2016—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–328, in introductory provisions, struck out ", or the president of a court-martial without a military judge," after "the military judge".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
Effective Date
Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title VIII, §802(b), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3906, provided that: "Section 850a of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(1), shall apply only to offenses committed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 14, 1986]."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 850a, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/850a.