FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—RELATIONSHIP, CONTINUATION, AND COMMON POLICIES OF DEFENSE COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE SYSTEMS

Combined exchange and commissary stores

10 U.S.C. § 2488
Title10Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—RELATIONSHIP, CONTINUATION, AND COMMON POLICIES OF DEFENSE COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE SYSTEMS

This text of 10 U.S.C. § 2488 (Combined exchange and commissary stores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 2488.

Text

(a)Authority.—The Secretary of Defense may authorize a nonappropriated fund instrumentality to operate a military exchange and a commissary store as a combined exchange and commissary store on a military installation.
(b)Limitations.—
(1)Not more than ten combined exchange and commissary stores may be operated pursuant to this section.
(2)The Secretary may select a military installation for the operation of a combined exchange and commissary store under this section only if—
(A)the installation is to be closed, or has been or is to be realigned, under a base closure law; or
(B)a military exchange and a commissary store are operated at the installation by separate entities at the time of, or immediately before, such selection and it is not economically feasible to continue that separat

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

North Dakota v. United States
495 U.S. 423 (Supreme Court, 1990)
217 case citations
Bolick v. Roberts
199 F. Supp. 2d 397 (E.D. Virginia, 2002)
12 case citations
West River Electric Ass'n v. Black Hills Power & Light Co.
918 F.2d 713 (Eighth Circuit, 1990)
4 case citations
United States v. North Dakota
675 F. Supp. 555 (D. North Dakota, 1987)
3 case citations
Ransom v. United States
668 F. App'x 169 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)
1 case citations
Marcia Ransom v. United States
(Seventh Circuit, 2016)
Slattery v. United States
(Federal Circuit, 2011)
United States v. State of ND
675 F. Supp. 555 (D. North Dakota, 1987)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title III, §336(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 263, §2490a; amended Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title X, §1061(d), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1891; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title X, §1043(c)(2), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1611; renumbered §2488, Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title VI, §651(b)(3), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1971; Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title X, §1075(b)(37), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4371.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
Section 375 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, referred to in subsec. (c), is section 375 of Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title III, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2736, as amended, which is not classified to the Code.

Prior Provisions
A prior section 2488 was renumbered section 2495 of this title.

Amendments
2011—Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 111–383 substituted "armed forces" for "Armed Forces" in two places.
2004—Pub. L. 108–375 renumbered section 2490a of this title as this section.
2003—Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 108–136, §1043(c)(2), substituted "Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Defined.—In this section, the term" for "Definitions.—In this section:
"(1) The term"
and struck out par. (2) which read as follows: "The term 'base closure law' has the meaning given such term by section 2667(h) of this title."
1997—Subsec. (f)(2). Pub. L. 105–85 substituted "section 2667(h)" for "section 2667(g)".

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 2488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/2488.