FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter 81

Rotation of career-conditional and career employees assigned to duty outside the United States

10 U.S.C. § 1586
Title10Armed Forces
Chapter81 — CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES

This text of 10 U.S.C. § 1586 (Rotation of career-conditional and career employees assigned to duty outside the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 1586.

Text

(a)In order to advance the programs and activities of the Defense Establishment, it is hereby declared to be the policy of the Congress to facilitate the interchange of civilian employees of the Defense Establishment between posts of duty in the United States and posts of duty outside the United States through the establishment and operation of programs for the rotation, to the extent consistent with the missions of the Defense Establishment and sound principles of administration, of such employees who are assigned to duty outside the United States.
(b)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Defense with respect to civilian employees of the Department of Defense other than employees of a military department, and the Secretary of each military department with respect

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vance v. Bradley
440 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1979)
1,447 case citations
Dancy v. United States
668 F.2d 1224 (Court of Claims, 1982)
23 case citations
Price v. United States
133 Fed. Cl. 128 (Federal Claims, 2017)
18 case citations
McClellan v. Humphrey
83 F. Supp. 510 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1949)
6 case citations
OCONUS DOD Employee Rotation Action Group v. Cohen
144 F. Supp. 2d 1 (District of Columbia, 2000)
5 case citations
Soper v. United States
677 F.2d 869 (Court of Claims, 1982)
5 case citations
Kumpe v. Gee
187 S.W.2d 932 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1945)
3 case citations
Lawrence Bros. v. Merit Sytems Protection Board
502 F. App'x 939 (Federal Circuit, 2013)
1 case citations
Terrol Prather v. Department of the Army
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
Christopher Chin-Young v. Department of the Army
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2023)
Kendall Baker v. Department of Defense
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
Chin-Young v. Army
(Federal Circuit, 2023)
Baseden v. Merit Systems Protection Board
629 F. App'x 962 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
Harris v. United States
640 F.2d 1309 (Court of Claims, 1981)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 86–585, §1, July 5, 1960, 74 Stat. 325; amended Pub. L. 89–718, §15, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1117; Pub. L. 90–83, §3(3), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 220; Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §511(61), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2925; Pub. L. 96–600, §1, Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3493; Pub. L. 97–295, §1(20)(A), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1290; Pub. L. 98–525, title XIV, §1405(29), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2623; Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title XVI, §1622(e)(4), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1605.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1989—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 101–189, in introductory provisions, substituted "In this section:" for "For the purposes of this section—", in par. (1), inserted "The term" before " 'rotation' " and substituted the period for "; and", and in par. (2), inserted "The term" before " 'grade' ".
1984—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–525, §1405(29)(A)(iii), in provisions following par. (3) struck out "of this subsection" after "paragraphs (2) and (3)".
Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 98–525, §1405(29)(A)(i), (ii), substituted "30" for "thirty" and struck out "of this section" after "subsection (c)".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98–525, §1405(29)(B)(i), in provisions preceding par. (1) substituted "30" for "thirty".
Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 98–525, §1405(29)(B)(ii), (iv), substituted "90 days" for "ninety days" and struck out "of this subsection" after "paragraph (2)".
Subsec. (c)(4). Pub. L. 98–525, §1405(29)(B)(ii), (iv), substituted "90 days" for "ninety days" and struck out "of this subsection" after "paragraph (3)".
Subsec. (c)(5). Pub. L. 98–525, §1405(29)(B)(iii)–(v), substituted "90-day" for "ninety-day", struck out "of this subsection" after "paragraphs (3) and (4)", and struck out "such" before "paragraph (4)".
Subsec. (c)(6). Pub. L. 98–525, §1405(29)(B)(vi), struck out "of this subsection" after "paragraph (1)" and "of this subsection," after "as applicable,".
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 98–525, §1405(29)(C), struck out "of this section" after "subsection (c)".
Subsec. (e)(1). Pub. L. 98–525, §1405(29)(C), struck out "of this section" after "subsection (c)(1)".
Subsec. (e)(2). Pub. L. 98–525, §1405(29)(D), struck out "of this subsection" after "paragraph (1)".
Subsec. (g)(1). Pub. L. 98–525, §1405(29)(C), struck out "of this section" after "subsection (b)".
1982—Subsecs. (d), (e)(1). Pub. L. 97–295 substituted "pay" for "compensation" wherever appearing.
1980—Subsecs. (c)(5), (e)(2). Pub. L. 96–513 substituted "Office of Personnel Management" for "United States Civil Service Commission".
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 96–600 added subsec. (h).
1967—Subsec. (g)(2). Pub. L. 90–83 substituted "General Schedule as prescribed in section 5104 of title 5" for "compensation schedule for the General Schedule of the Classification Act of 1949, as amended,".
1966—Pub. L. 89–718 substituted "sections 3501–3503 of title 5" for "section 12 of the Act of June 27, 1944 (5 U.S.C. 861)" wherever appearing.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701(b)(3) of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

Executive Documents

Ex. Ord. No. 10895. Duty in Alaska or Hawaii
Ex. Ord. No. 10895, Nov. 25, 1960, 25 F.R. 12165, provided:
By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 1586(f) of title 10 of the United States Code, and as President of the United States, and having determined that such action is necessary in the national interest, it is ordered as follows:
Section 1. Assignment of an employee to duty in the State of Alaska or Hawaii under regulations prescribed pursuant to section 1586 of title 10 of the United States Code shall be held and considered for the purposes of that section, to be an assignment to duty outside the United States.
Sec. 2. The Secretary of Defense shall from time to time, and at least annually, consider the need for continuing this order in effect, and he shall recommend the revocation thereof at such time as he may deem such action advisable.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 1586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/1586.