FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter 1007
Non-dual status technicians
10 U.S.C. § 10217
Title10 — Armed Forces
Chapter1007 — ADMINISTRATION OF RESERVE COMPONENTS
This text of 10 U.S.C. § 10217 (Non-dual status technicians) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 10217.
Text
(a)Definition.—For the purposes of this section and any other provision of law, a non-dual status technician is a civilian employee of the Department of Defense serving in a military technician position who—
(1)was hired as a technician before November 18, 1997, under any of the authorities specified in subsection (b) and as of that date is not a member of the Selected Reserve or after such date has ceased to be a member of the Selected Reserve;
(2)is employed under section 709 of title 32 in a position designated under subsection (c) of that section and when hired was not required to maintain membership in the Selected Reserve; or
(3)is hired as a temporary employee pursuant to the exception for temporary employment provided by subsection (d) and subject to the terms and conditions of
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Zuress v. Donley
606 F.3d 1249 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Stoglin v. Merit Systems Protection Board
640 F. App'x 864 (Federal Circuit, 2016)
Donald Larry Martin v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
903 F.3d 1154 (Eleventh Circuit, 2018)
Corey D. Stoglin v. Department of the Air Force
2015 MSPB 43 (Merit Systems Protection Board, 2015)
McGrady v. Mattis
(M.D. Tennessee, 2019)
Rich Bradley v. Department of the Air Force
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2024)
Pérez v. Puerto Rico National Guard
951 F. Supp. 2d 279 (D. Puerto Rico, 2013)
Larry Greene v. Department of the Army
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2023)
Oliver v. Wong
158 F. Supp. 3d 1036 (D. Hawaii, 2016)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title V, §523(a)(1), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1736; amended Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title V, §523, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 598; Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title IV, §414(c)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–94; Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title IV, §414(d), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2527; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title IV, §415, Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1453; Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title V, §513, title X, §1075(b)(53), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4210, 4372; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, §1076(e)(7), (f)(45), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1951, 1955; Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title X, §1053(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 981; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title X, §1084(b), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2421; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title XVII, §1731(a)(62), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1816.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Section 8016 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1996 (Public Law 104–61; 109 Stat. 654), referred to in subsec. (b)(4), was set out as a note under section 10101 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title V, §522(e), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1735.
Amendments
2019—Subsec. (e)(4). Pub. L. 116–92 substituted "shall be an individual" for "shall an individual".
2016—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 114–328 amended subsec. (e) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (e) related to phased-in termination of non-dual status positions.
2015—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 114–92 added subsec. (e).
2013—Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 112–239, §1076(f)(45), substituted "considered" for "consider".
Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 112–239, §1076(e)(7), substituted "after January 6, 2013" for "after the end of the 2-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this subsection".
2011—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 111–383, §513(a)(1), added par. (3).
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 111–383, §1075(b)(53), substituted "The" for "Effective October 1, 2007, the" and struck out "after the preceding sentence takes effect" after "If at any time".
Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 111–383, §513(b), added par. (3).
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 111–383, §513(a)(2), added subsec. (d).
2003—Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 108–136 substituted "may not exceed 595 and by the Air Force Reserve may not exceed 90" for "and Air Force Reserve may not exceed 175".
2002—Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 107–314 substituted "The total number" for "Effective October 1, 2002, the total number" in first sentence and struck out "after the preceding sentence takes effect" after "If at any time" in second sentence.
2000—Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 106–398 substituted "October 1, 2002" for "October 1, 2001".
1999—Pub. L. 106–65, §523(b), struck out "military" after "status" in section catchline.
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–65, §523(a)(1)(A), struck out "military" after "non-dual status" in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (a)(1), (2). Pub. L. 106–65, §523(a)(1)(B), added pars. (1) and (2) and struck out former pars. (1) and (2) which read as follows:
"(1) was hired as a military technician before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 under any of the authorities specified in subsection (c); and
"(2) as of the date of the enactment of that Act is not a member of the Selected Reserve or after such date ceased to be a member of the Selected Reserve."
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 106–65, §523(a)(2), added subsec. (c).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title V, §525, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 600, provided that: "The amendments made by sections 523 and 524 [amending this section and section 709 of Title 32, National Guard] shall take effect 180 days after the date of the receipt by Congress of the plan required by section 523(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1737) [set out below] [plan received by Congress from Under Secretary of Defense, Personnel and Readiness on Sept. 21, 1999, see Cong. Rec., vol. 145, pt. 15, p. 21975, Ex. Comm. 4276] or a report by the Secretary of Defense providing an alternative proposal to the plan required by that section."
Plan for Full Utilization of Military Technicians (Dual Status)
Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title V, §523(d), (e), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1737, provided that:
"(d) Plan for Full Utilization of Military Technicians (Dual Status).—(1) Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 18, 1997], the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a plan for ensuring that, on and after September 30, 2007, all military technician positions are held only by military technicians (dual status).
"(2) The plan shall provide for achieving, by September 30, 2002, a 50 percent reduction, by conversion of positions or otherwise, in the number of non-dual status military technicians that are holding military technicians positions, as compared with the number of non-dual status technicians that held military technician positions as of September 30, 1997, as specified in the report under subsection (c) [111 Stat. 1737].
"(3) Among the alternative actions to be considered in developing the plan, the Secretary shall consider the feasibility and cost of each of the following:
"(A) Eliminating or consolidating technician functions and positions.
"(B) Contracting with private sector sources for the performance of functions performed by military technicians.
"(C) Converting non-dual status military technician positions to military technician (dual status) positions or to positions in the competitive service or, in the case of positions of the Army National Guard of the United States or the Air National Guard of the United States, to positions of State employment.
"(D) Use of incentives to facilitate attainment of the objectives specified for the plan in paragraphs (1) and (2).
"(4) The Secretary shall submit with the plan any recommendations for legislation that the Secretary considers necessary to carry out the plan.
"(e) Definitions for Categories of Military Technicians.—In this section [enacting this section]:
"(1) The term 'non-dual status military technician' has the meaning given that term in section 10217 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a).
"(2) The term 'military technician (dual status)' has the meaning given the term in section 10216(a) of such title."
References in Text
Section 8016 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1996 (Public Law 104–61; 109 Stat. 654), referred to in subsec. (b)(4), was set out as a note under section 10101 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title V, §522(e), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1735.
Amendments
2019—Subsec. (e)(4). Pub. L. 116–92 substituted "shall be an individual" for "shall an individual".
2016—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 114–328 amended subsec. (e) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (e) related to phased-in termination of non-dual status positions.
2015—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 114–92 added subsec. (e).
2013—Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 112–239, §1076(f)(45), substituted "considered" for "consider".
Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 112–239, §1076(e)(7), substituted "after January 6, 2013" for "after the end of the 2-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this subsection".
2011—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 111–383, §513(a)(1), added par. (3).
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 111–383, §1075(b)(53), substituted "The" for "Effective October 1, 2007, the" and struck out "after the preceding sentence takes effect" after "If at any time".
Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 111–383, §513(b), added par. (3).
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 111–383, §513(a)(2), added subsec. (d).
2003—Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 108–136 substituted "may not exceed 595 and by the Air Force Reserve may not exceed 90" for "and Air Force Reserve may not exceed 175".
2002—Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 107–314 substituted "The total number" for "Effective October 1, 2002, the total number" in first sentence and struck out "after the preceding sentence takes effect" after "If at any time" in second sentence.
2000—Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 106–398 substituted "October 1, 2002" for "October 1, 2001".
1999—Pub. L. 106–65, §523(b), struck out "military" after "status" in section catchline.
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–65, §523(a)(1)(A), struck out "military" after "non-dual status" in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (a)(1), (2). Pub. L. 106–65, §523(a)(1)(B), added pars. (1) and (2) and struck out former pars. (1) and (2) which read as follows:
"(1) was hired as a military technician before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 under any of the authorities specified in subsection (c); and
"(2) as of the date of the enactment of that Act is not a member of the Selected Reserve or after such date ceased to be a member of the Selected Reserve."
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 106–65, §523(a)(2), added subsec. (c).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title V, §525, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 600, provided that: "The amendments made by sections 523 and 524 [amending this section and section 709 of Title 32, National Guard] shall take effect 180 days after the date of the receipt by Congress of the plan required by section 523(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1737) [set out below] [plan received by Congress from Under Secretary of Defense, Personnel and Readiness on Sept. 21, 1999, see Cong. Rec., vol. 145, pt. 15, p. 21975, Ex. Comm. 4276] or a report by the Secretary of Defense providing an alternative proposal to the plan required by that section."
Plan for Full Utilization of Military Technicians (Dual Status)
Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title V, §523(d), (e), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1737, provided that:
"(d) Plan for Full Utilization of Military Technicians (Dual Status).—(1) Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 18, 1997], the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a plan for ensuring that, on and after September 30, 2007, all military technician positions are held only by military technicians (dual status).
"(2) The plan shall provide for achieving, by September 30, 2002, a 50 percent reduction, by conversion of positions or otherwise, in the number of non-dual status military technicians that are holding military technicians positions, as compared with the number of non-dual status technicians that held military technician positions as of September 30, 1997, as specified in the report under subsection (c) [111 Stat. 1737].
"(3) Among the alternative actions to be considered in developing the plan, the Secretary shall consider the feasibility and cost of each of the following:
"(A) Eliminating or consolidating technician functions and positions.
"(B) Contracting with private sector sources for the performance of functions performed by military technicians.
"(C) Converting non-dual status military technician positions to military technician (dual status) positions or to positions in the competitive service or, in the case of positions of the Army National Guard of the United States or the Air National Guard of the United States, to positions of State employment.
"(D) Use of incentives to facilitate attainment of the objectives specified for the plan in paragraphs (1) and (2).
"(4) The Secretary shall submit with the plan any recommendations for legislation that the Secretary considers necessary to carry out the plan.
"(e) Definitions for Categories of Military Technicians.—In this section [enacting this section]:
"(1) The term 'non-dual status military technician' has the meaning given that term in section 10217 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a).
"(2) The term 'military technician (dual status)' has the meaning given the term in section 10216(a) of such title."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 10217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/10217.