FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 85

Supplemental jurisdiction

28 U.S.C. § 1367
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter85 — DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (Supplemental jurisdiction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1367.

Text

(a)Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) or as expressly provided otherwise by Federal statute, in any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction, the district courts shall have supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution. Such supplemental jurisdiction shall include claims that involve the joinder or intervention of additional parties.
(b)In any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded solely on section 1332 of this title, the district courts shall not have supplemental jurisdiction under subsection (a) over claims by plaintiffs agains

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Louis Bianchi v. Thomas McQueen
818 F.3d 309 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)
162 case citations
Coastal Fuels of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Caribbean Petroleum Corp.
79 F.3d 182 (First Circuit, 1996)
130 case citations
Dietchweiler Ex Rel. Dietchweiler v. Lucas
827 F.3d 622 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)
119 case citations
Hill v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
946 F. Supp. 2d 817 (N.D. Illinois, 2013)
35 case citations
Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. Barr
912 F. Supp. 2d 671 (N.D. Illinois, 2012)
19 case citations
Gerard Piscopo v. Public Service Electric and Ga
650 F. App'x 106 (Third Circuit, 2016)
16 case citations
Perlman v. Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC
932 F. Supp. 2d 397 (E.D. New York, 2013)
6 case citations
Washington v. District of Columbia Housing Authority
170 F. Supp. 3d 234 (District of Columbia, 2016)
5 case citations
John Duda v. Standard Insurance Co
649 F. App'x 230 (Third Circuit, 2016)
5 case citations
Hart v. Township of Hillside
228 F. App'x 159 (Third Circuit, 2007)
4 case citations
Baig v. Coca-Cola Co.
69 F. Supp. 3d 766 (N.D. Illinois, 2014)
4 case citations
Michele Fotinos v. John Fotinos
644 F. App'x 793 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
3 case citations
Lyle v. Dodd
857 F. Supp. 958 (N.D. Georgia, 1994)
3 case citations
Bosch v. LaMattina
901 F. Supp. 2d 394 (E.D. New York, 2012)
3 case citations
Harold Blakely v. City of Laurel
644 F. App'x 319 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)
2 case citations
Kreig v. Prairie Island Dakota Sioux
21 F.3d 302 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
2 case citations
Cherry v. District of Columbia
170 F. Supp. 3d 46 (District of Columbia, 2016)
1 case citations
Marini v. Adamo
(Second Circuit, 2016)
Abshire v. Parish of Iberia
(Fifth Circuit, 1996)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §310(a), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5113.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (b), are set out in the Appendix to this title.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date
Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §310(c), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5114, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section] shall apply to civil actions commenced on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 1, 1990]."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1367.