FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 85
Supplemental jurisdiction
28 U.S.C. § 1367
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter85 — DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (Supplemental jurisdiction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1367.
Text
(a)Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) or as expressly provided otherwise by Federal statute, in any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction, the district courts shall have supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution. Such supplemental jurisdiction shall include claims that involve the joinder or intervention of additional parties.
(b)In any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded solely on section 1332 of this title, the district courts shall not have supplemental jurisdiction under subsection (a) over claims by plaintiffs agains
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Louis Bianchi v. Thomas McQueen
818 F.3d 309 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)
Coastal Fuels of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Caribbean Petroleum Corp.
79 F.3d 182 (First Circuit, 1996)
Dietchweiler Ex Rel. Dietchweiler v. Lucas
827 F.3d 622 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)
Hill v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
946 F. Supp. 2d 817 (N.D. Illinois, 2013)
Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. Barr
912 F. Supp. 2d 671 (N.D. Illinois, 2012)
Gerard Piscopo v. Public Service Electric and Ga
650 F. App'x 106 (Third Circuit, 2016)
Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services, Ltd. v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp.
15 F.3d 1230 (Third Circuit, 1994)
Perlman v. Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC
932 F. Supp. 2d 397 (E.D. New York, 2013)
Washington v. District of Columbia Housing Authority
170 F. Supp. 3d 234 (District of Columbia, 2016)
John Duda v. Standard Insurance Co
649 F. App'x 230 (Third Circuit, 2016)
Hart v. Township of Hillside
228 F. App'x 159 (Third Circuit, 2007)
Baig v. Coca-Cola Co.
69 F. Supp. 3d 766 (N.D. Illinois, 2014)
Michele Fotinos v. John Fotinos
644 F. App'x 793 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Lyle v. Dodd
857 F. Supp. 958 (N.D. Georgia, 1994)
Bosch v. LaMattina
901 F. Supp. 2d 394 (E.D. New York, 2012)
Harold Blakely v. City of Laurel
644 F. App'x 319 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)
Kreig v. Prairie Island Dakota Sioux
21 F.3d 302 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
Cherry v. District of Columbia
170 F. Supp. 3d 46 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Marini v. Adamo
(Second Circuit, 2016)
Abshire v. Parish of Iberia
(Fifth Circuit, 1996)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §310(a), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5113.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (b), are set out in the Appendix to this title.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §310(c), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5114, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section] shall apply to civil actions commenced on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 1, 1990]."
References in Text
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (b), are set out in the Appendix to this title.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §310(c), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5114, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section] shall apply to civil actions commenced on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 1, 1990]."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1367.