West Virginia § 5-22B-12 Criteria for evaluation

West Virginia Statutes

§ 5-22B-12 — Criteria for evaluation

West Virginia § 5-22B-12

Ch. 5GENERAL POWERS AND AUTHORITY OF THE GOVERNOR, SECRETARY OF STATE AND ATTORNEY GENERAL; BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS; MISCELLANEOUS AGENCIES, COMMISSIONS, OFFICES, PROGRAMS, ETC

Art. 22BGOVERNMENT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AT-RISK CONTRACTS

This text of West Virginia § 5-22B-12 (Criteria for evaluation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

W. Va. Code § 5-22B-12 (2026).

Text

(a)The evaluation committee shall evaluate proposals taking into consideration the criteria set out in this section with the maximum percentage of total points for evaluation which may be assigned to each criterion as set forth in this section. The following criteria shall be evaluated, when applicable:

(1)The financial resources of the construction manager to complete the project, 10 percent;

(2)The ability of the proposed personnel of the construction manager to perform, 20 percent;

(3)The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, experience, and efficiency of the construction manager, 20 percent;

(4)The quality of performance on previous projects, 20 percent;

(5)The ability of the construction manager to perform within the time specified, 10 percent;

(6)The previous and e

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(a) The evaluation committee shall evaluate proposals taking into consideration the criteria set out in this section with the maximum percentage of total points for evaluation which may be assigned to each criterion as set forth in this section. The following criteria shall be evaluated, when applicable:

(1) The financial resources of the construction manager to complete the project, 10 percent;

(2) The ability of the proposed personnel of the construction manager to perform, 20 percent;

(3) The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, experience, and efficiency of the construction manager, 20 percent;

(4) The quality of performance on previous projects, 20 percent;

(5) The ability of the construction manager to perform within the time specified, 10 percent;

(6) The previous and existing compliance of the construction manager with laws relating to the contract, 10 percent; and

(7) Such other information as may be secured having a bearing on the selection, 10 percent.

(b) The records of the evaluation committee in evaluating proposals and making recommendations shall be considered public records for purposes of §29B-1-1et seq. of this code.