Washington Statutes
§ 85.18.100 — Review by superior court—How taken.
Washington § 85.18.100
JurisdictionWashington
Title 85DIKING AND DRAINAGE
Ch. 85.18LEVY FOR CONTINUOUS BENEFITS—DIKING DISTRICTS
This text of Washington § 85.18.100 (Review by superior court—How taken.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wash. Rev. Code § 85.18.100 (2026).
Text
The decision of the board of commissioners upon any objection made within the time and in the manner prescribed may be reviewed by the superior court of the county wherein the property in question is located, upon appeal thereto taken in the following manner: Any person aggrieved must file his or her petition for writ of review with the clerk of the superior court wherein the property is located within ten days after the roll affecting such aggrieved party was adopted by resolution, and serve a copy thereof upon the commissioners. The petition shall describe the property in question, set forth the written objections which were made to the decision, the date of filing of such objections, and be signed by such party or one in his or her behalf. The court shall forthwith grant such petition i
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gabelein v. Diking District No. 1
328 P.3d 1008 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2014)
Ray E. And Laurie Gabelein, Respondent's v. Diking District No. 1
(Court of Appeals of Washington, 2014)
Legislative History
[2013 c 23 s 429;1951 c 45 s 11.]
Nearby Sections
15
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Washington § 85.18.100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/wa/85.18.100.