This text of Washington § 47.47.140 (Best value finding and agreement execution.(Effective July 1, 2026.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Before executing an agreement under RCW 47.47.130 , the department must make a formal finding that the negotiated partnership agreement is expected to result in best value for the public, and the agreement must be approved through duly enacted legislation. The department must develop and adopt a process and criteria for measuring, determining, and transparently reporting best value relevant to the proposed project. At minimum, the criteria must include:
(1)A comparison of the total cost to deliver the project, including any operations and maintenance costs, as a public-private partnership compared to traditional or other alternative delivery methods available to the department;
(2)A comparison with the department's current plan, resources, delivery capacity, and schedule to complete th
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Before executing an agreement under RCW 47.47.130 , the department must make a formal finding that the negotiated partnership agreement is expected to result in best value for the public, and the agreement must be approved through duly enacted legislation. The department must develop and adopt a process and criteria for measuring, determining, and transparently reporting best value relevant to the proposed project. At minimum, the criteria must include:
(1) A comparison of the total cost to deliver the project, including any operations and maintenance costs, as a public-private partnership compared to traditional or other alternative delivery methods available to the department;
(2) A comparison with the department's current plan, resources, delivery capacity, and schedule to complete the project that documents the advantages of completing the project as a public-private partnership versus solely as a public venture; and
(3) Factors such as, but not limited to: Priority, cost, risk sharing, scheduling, asset and service quality, innovation, and management conditions.
Effective date — 2025 c 417 ss 304 and 1201-1224: See note following RCW 46.63.200 .
Findings — Intent — 2025 c 417: See note following RCW 82.38.030 .