Washington § 46.61.50571 Alcohol or cannabis violators—Mandatory appearances—Electronic monitoring or alcohol abstinence monitoring.

Washington Statutes

§ 46.61.50571 — Alcohol or cannabis violators—Mandatory appearances—Electronic monitoring or alcohol abstinence monitoring.

Washington § 46.61.50571

Title 46MOTOR VEHICLES

Ch. 46.61RULES OF THE ROAD

This text of Washington § 46.61.50571 (Alcohol or cannabis violators—Mandatory appearances—Electronic monitoring or alcohol abstinence monitoring.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wash. Rev. Code § 46.61.50571 (2026).

Text

(1)A defendant who is charged with an offense involving driving while under the influence as defined in RCW 46.61.502 , driving under age twenty-one after consuming alcohol or cannabis as defined in RCW 46.61.503 , or being in physical control of a vehicle while under the influence as defined in RCW 46.61.504 , shall be required to appear in person before a judicial officer within one judicial day after the arrest if the defendant is served with a citation or complaint at the time of the arrest. A court may by local court rule waive the requirement for appearance within one judicial day if it provides for the appearance at the earliest practicable day following arrest and establishes the method for identifying that day in the rule.

(2)A defendant who is charged with an offense involving

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(1) A defendant who is charged with an offense involving driving while under the influence as defined in RCW 46.61.502 , driving under age twenty-one after consuming alcohol or cannabis as defined in RCW 46.61.503 , or being in physical control of a vehicle while under the influence as defined in RCW 46.61.504 , shall be required to appear in person before a judicial officer within one judicial day after the arrest if the defendant is served with a citation or complaint at the time of the arrest. A court may by local court rule waive the requirement for appearance within one judicial day if it provides for the appearance at the earliest practicable day following arrest and establishes the method for identifying that day in the rule.

(2) A defendant who is charged with an offense involving driving while under the influence as defined in RCW 46.61.502 , driving under age twenty-one after consuming alcohol or cannabis as defined in RCW 46.61.503 , or being in physical control of a vehicle while under the influence as defined in RCW 46.61.504 , and who is not served with a citation or complaint at the time of the incident, shall appear in court for arraignment in person as soon as practicable, but in no event later than fourteen days after the next day on which court is in session following the issuance of the citation or the filing of the complaint or information.

(3) At the time of an appearance required by this section, the court shall determine the necessity of imposing conditions of pretrial release according to the procedures established by court rule for a preliminary appearance or an arraignment.

(4) Appearances required by this section are mandatory and may not be waived.

(5) If electronic monitoring or alcohol abstinence monitoring is ordered, the court shall specify who shall provide the monitoring services, and the terms under which the monitoring shall be performed. Upon conviction, the court may require as a condition of the sentence that the defendant reimburse the providing agency for the costs of the electronic monitoring or abstinence monitoring.

Intent — Finding — 2022 c 16: See note following RCW 69.50.101 .

Intent — 2013 c 3 (Initiative Measure No. 502): See note following RCW 69.50.101 .

Effective date — 1998 c 214: See note following RCW 46.61.5055 .

Legislative History

[2022 c 16 s 43;2015 3rd sp.s. c 35 s 2;2013 c 3 s 36(Initiative Measure No. 502, approved November 6, 2012);2000 c 52 s 1;1999 c 114 s 1;1998 c 214 s 5.]