Washington § 41.50.630 Mandatory assignment of retirement benefits—Hearing to quash, modify, or terminate order.

Washington Statutes

§ 41.50.630 — Mandatory assignment of retirement benefits—Hearing to quash, modify, or terminate order.

Washington § 41.50.630

Title 41PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT, CIVIL SERVICE, AND PENSIONS

Ch. 41.50DEPARTMENT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS

This text of Washington § 41.50.630 (Mandatory assignment of retirement benefits—Hearing to quash, modify, or terminate order.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wash. Rev. Code § 41.50.630 (2026).

Text

In a hearing to quash, modify, or terminate the mandatory benefits assignment order, the court may grant relief only upon a showing that the mandatory benefits assignment order causes extreme hardship or substantial injustice. Satisfaction by the obligor of all past due payments subsequent to the issuance of the mandatory benefits assignment order is not grounds to quash, modify, or terminate the mandatory benefits assignment order. If a mandatory benefits assignment order has been in operation for twelve consecutive months and the obligor's spousal maintenance is current, the court may terminate the order upon motion of the obligor unless the obligee can show good cause as to why the mandatory benefits assignment order should remain in effect.

Severability — 1991 c 365: See note followin

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a hearing to quash, modify, or terminate the mandatory benefits assignment order, the court may grant relief only upon a showing that the mandatory benefits assignment order causes extreme hardship or substantial injustice. Satisfaction by the obligor of all past due payments subsequent to the issuance of the mandatory benefits assignment order is not grounds to quash, modify, or terminate the mandatory benefits assignment order. If a mandatory benefits assignment order has been in operation for twelve consecutive months and the obligor's spousal maintenance is current, the court may terminate the order upon motion of the obligor unless the obligee can show good cause as to why the mandatory benefits assignment order should remain in effect.

Severability — 1991 c 365: See note following RCW 41.50.500 .