Washington Statutes
§ 36.70.970 — Hearing examiner system—Adoption authorized—Alternative—Functions—Procedures.
Washington § 36.70.970
This text of Washington § 36.70.970 (Hearing examiner system—Adoption authorized—Alternative—Functions—Procedures.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wash. Rev. Code § 36.70.970 (2026).
Text
(1)As an alternative to those provisions of this chapter relating to powers or duties of the planning commission to hear and issue recommendations on applications for plat approval and applications for amendments to the zoning ordinance, the county legislative authority may adopt a hearing examiner system under which a hearing examiner or hearing examiners may hear and issue decisions on proposals for plat approval and for amendments to the zoning ordinance when the amendment which is applied for is not of general applicability. In addition, the legislative authority may vest in a hearing examiner the power to hear and decide those issues it believes should be reviewed and decided by a hearing examiner, including but not limited to:
(a)Applications for conditional uses, variances, shore
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
296 P.3d 860 (Washington Supreme Court, 2013)
Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish County
829 P.2d 746 (Washington Supreme Court, 1992)
State Ex Rel. Lige & Wm. B. Dickson Co. v. County of Pierce
829 P.2d 217 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1992)
Bjarnson v. Kitsap County
899 P.2d 1290 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1995)
Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish County
910 P.2d 513 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1996)
Stanzel v. Pierce County
150 Wash. App. 835 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2009)
Stanzel v. City of Puyallup
209 P.3d 534 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2009)
Kiewit Construction Group, Inc. v. Clark County
920 P.2d 1207 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1996)
Fall City Sustainable Growth, V. King County
(Court of Appeals of Washington, 2025)
Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy
(Washington Supreme Court, 2013)
Legislative History
[1995 c 347 s 425;1994 c 257 s 9;1977 ex.s. c 213 s 3.]
Nearby Sections
15
§ 36.01.010
Corporate powers.§ 36.01.020
Corporate name.§ 36.01.030
Powers—How exercised.§ 36.01.040
Conveyances for use of county.§ 36.01.050
Venue of actions by or against counties.§ 36.01.060
County liable for certain court costs.§ 36.01.070
Probation and parole services.§ 36.01.085
Economic development programs.§ 36.01.090
Tourist promotion.§ 36.01.095
Emergency medical services—Authorized—Fees.§ 36.01.100
Ambulance service authorized—Restriction.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Washington § 36.70.970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/wa/36.70.970.