Utah § 81-11-207 Inconvenient forum.

Utah Statutes

§ 81-11-207 — Inconvenient forum.

Utah § 81-11-207

Title 81Utah Domestic Relations Code

Ch. 81-11Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act

Part 81-11-2Jurisdiction

This text of Utah § 81-11-207 (Inconvenient forum.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Utah Code Ann. § 81-11-207 (2026).

Text

(1)(1)(a) A court of this state that has jurisdiction under this chapter to make a child custody determination may decline to exercise its jurisdiction at any time if the court determines that the court is an inconvenient forum under the circumstances and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum.

(1)(b) The issue of inconvenient forum may be raised upon the court's own motion, request of another court, or motion of a party.

(2)(2)(a) Before determining whether the court is an inconvenient forum, a court of this state shall consider whether it is appropriate that a court of another state exercise jurisdiction.

(2)(b) In making a determination under Subsection (2)(a), the court shall:

(2)(b)(i) allow the parties to submit information; and

(2)(b)(ii) consider all relevant f

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(1) (1)(a) A court of this state that has jurisdiction under this chapter to make a child custody determination may decline to exercise its jurisdiction at any time if the court determines that the court is an inconvenient forum under the circumstances and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum.
(1)(b) The issue of inconvenient forum may be raised upon the court's own motion, request of another court, or motion of a party.
(2) (2)(a) Before determining whether the court is an inconvenient forum, a court of this state shall consider whether it is appropriate that a court of another state exercise jurisdiction.
(2)(b) In making a determination under Subsection (2)(a), the court shall:
(2)(b)(i) allow the parties to submit information; and
(2)(b)(ii) consider all relevant factors, including:
(2)(b)(ii)(A) whether domestic violence has occurred and is likely to continue in the future and which state could best protect the parties and the minor child;
(2)(b)(ii)(B) the length of time the minor child has resided outside this state;
(2)(b)(ii)(C) the distance between the court in this state and the court in the state that would assume jurisdiction;
(2)(b)(ii)(D) the relative financial circumstances of the parties;
(2)(b)(ii)(E) any agreement of the parties as to which state should assume jurisdiction;
(2)(b)(ii)(F) the nature and location of the evidence required to resolve the pending litigation, including the testimony of the minor child;
(2)(b)(ii)(G) the ability of the court of each state to decide the issue expeditiously and the procedures necessary to present the evidence; and
(2)(b)(ii)(H) the familiarity of the court of each state with the facts and issues of the pending litigation.
(3) If a court of this state determines that the court is an inconvenient forum and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum, the court shall stay the proceedings upon condition that a child custody proceeding be promptly commenced in another designated state and may impose any other condition the court considers just and proper.
(4) A court of this state may decline to exercise the court's jurisdiction under this chapter if a child custody determination is incidental to an action for divorce or another proceeding while still retaining jurisdiction over the divorce or other proceeding.