Utah § 78B-4-305 Stay pending motion to dismiss.

Utah Statutes

§ 78B-4-305 — Stay pending motion to dismiss.

Utah § 78B-4-305

Title 78BJudicial Code

Ch. 78B-4Limitations on Liability

Part 78B-4-3Commonsense Consumption Act

This text of Utah § 78B-4-305 (Stay pending motion to dismiss.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Utah Code Ann. § 78B-4-305 (2026).

Text

(1)In any action commenced under the provisions of Subsection 78B-4-303(2), all discovery and other proceedings shall be stayed during the pendency of any motion to dismiss unless the court finds upon the motion of any party that particularized discovery is necessary to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to a party.

(2)During the pendency of any stay of discovery pursuant to this section, unless otherwise ordered by the court, any party to the action with actual notice of the allegations contained in the complaint shall treat all documents, data compilations, and tangible objects that are in the custody or control of the party and are relevant to the allegations, as if they were the subject of a continuing request for production from an opposing party under Rule 34, URCP.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(1) In any action commenced under the provisions of Subsection 78B-4-303(2), all discovery and other proceedings shall be stayed during the pendency of any motion to dismiss unless the court finds upon the motion of any party that particularized discovery is necessary to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to a party.
(2) During the pendency of any stay of discovery pursuant to this section, unless otherwise ordered by the court, any party to the action with actual notice of the allegations contained in the complaint shall treat all documents, data compilations, and tangible objects that are in the custody or control of the party and are relevant to the allegations, as if they were the subject of a continuing request for production from an opposing party under Rule 34, URCP.