Utah § 78B-4-304 Pleading requirements.

Utah Statutes

§ 78B-4-304 — Pleading requirements.

Utah § 78B-4-304

Title 78BJudicial Code

Ch. 78B-4Limitations on Liability

Part 78B-4-3Commonsense Consumption Act

This text of Utah § 78B-4-304 (Pleading requirements.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Utah Code Ann. § 78B-4-304 (2026).

Text

(1)In any action commenced under the provisions of Subsection 78B-4-303(2), the complaint or petition shall state with particularity the following:

(1)(a) the statute, rule, regulation, ordinance, or other law that was allegedly violated;

(1)(b) the facts that are alleged to constitute a material violation of the statute, rule, regulation, ordinance, or other law; and

(1)(c) the facts alleged to demonstrate that the violation proximately caused actual injury to the plaintiff.

(2)The complaint or petition shall also state with particularity facts sufficient to support a reasonable inference that the violation was with intent to deceive or injure consumers or with the actual knowledge that the violation was injurious to consumers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(1) In any action commenced under the provisions of Subsection 78B-4-303(2), the complaint or petition shall state with particularity the following:

(1)(a) the statute, rule, regulation, ordinance, or other law that was allegedly violated;
(1)(b) the facts that are alleged to constitute a material violation of the statute, rule, regulation, ordinance, or other law; and
(1)(c) the facts alleged to demonstrate that the violation proximately caused actual injury to the plaintiff.
(2) The complaint or petition shall also state with particularity facts sufficient to support a reasonable inference that the violation was with intent to deceive or injure consumers or with the actual knowledge that the violation was injurious to consumers.