Utah § 75A-9-115 Validity of advance health care directive -- Conflict with other law.

Utah Statutes

§ 75A-9-115 — Validity of advance health care directive -- Conflict with other law.

Utah § 75A-9-115

Title 75AFiduciaries

Ch. 75A-9Uniform Health Care Decisions Act

This text of Utah § 75A-9-115 (Validity of advance health care directive -- Conflict with other law.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Utah Code Ann. § 75A-9-115 (2026).

Text

(1)An advance health care directive created outside this state is valid if it complies with:

(1)(a) the law of the state specified in the directive or, if a state is not specified, the state in which the individual created the directive; or

(1)(b) this chapter.

(2)A person may assume without inquiry that an advance health care directive is genuine, valid, and still in effect, and may implement and rely on it, unless the person has good cause to believe the directive is invalid or has been revoked.

(3)An advance health care directive, revocation of a directive, or a signature on a directive or revocation may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form.

(4)Evidence relating to an advance health care directive, revocation of a directive, or a signa

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(1) An advance health care directive created outside this state is valid if it complies with:
(1)(a) the law of the state specified in the directive or, if a state is not specified, the state in which the individual created the directive; or
(1)(b) this chapter.
(2) A person may assume without inquiry that an advance health care directive is genuine, valid, and still in effect, and may implement and rely on it, unless the person has good cause to believe the directive is invalid or has been revoked.
(3) An advance health care directive, revocation of a directive, or a signature on a directive or revocation may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form.
(4) Evidence relating to an advance health care directive, revocation of a directive, or a signature on a directive or revocation may not be excluded in a proceeding solely because the evidence is in electronic form.
(5) This chapter does not affect the validity of an electronic record or signature that is valid under Title 46, Chapter 4, Uniform Electronic Transactions Act.
(6) If this chapter conflicts with other law of this state relating to the creation, execution, implementation, or revocation of an advance health care directive, this chapter prevails.