Utah § 63A-16-902 Submitting a technology proposal -- Review process.

Utah Statutes

§ 63A-16-902 — Submitting a technology proposal -- Review process.

Utah § 63A-16-902

Title 63AUtah Government Operations Code

Ch. 63A-16Utah Technology Governance Act

Part 63A-16-9Technology Innovation Act

This text of Utah § 63A-16-902 (Submitting a technology proposal -- Review process.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Utah Code Ann. § 63A-16-902 (2026).

Text

(1)Multiple executive branch agencies may jointly submit to the chief information officer a technology proposal, on a form or in a format specified by the division.

(2)The chief information officer shall transmit to the review board each technology proposal the chief information officer determines meets the form or format requirements of the division.

(3)The review board shall:

(3)(a) conduct a technical review of a technology proposal transmitted by the chief information officer;

(3)(b) determine whether the technology proposal merits further review and consideration by the chief information officer, based on the technology proposal's likelihood to:

(3)(b)(i) be capable of being implemented effectively; and

(3)(b)(ii) result in greater efficiency in a government process or a cost savi

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(1) Multiple executive branch agencies may jointly submit to the chief information officer a technology proposal, on a form or in a format specified by the division.
(2) The chief information officer shall transmit to the review board each technology proposal the chief information officer determines meets the form or format requirements of the division.
(3) The review board shall:

(3)(a) conduct a technical review of a technology proposal transmitted by the chief information officer;
(3)(b) determine whether the technology proposal merits further review and consideration by the chief information officer, based on the technology proposal's likelihood to:
(3)(b)(i) be capable of being implemented effectively; and
(3)(b)(ii) result in greater efficiency in a government process or a cost saving in the delivery of a government service, or both; and
(3)(c) transmit a technology proposal to the chief information officer and to the governor's budget office, if the review board determines that the technology proposal merits further review and consideration by the chief information officer.