Utah § 53G-11-507 Components of educator evaluation program.

Utah Statutes

§ 53G-11-507 — Components of educator evaluation program.

Utah § 53G-11-507

Title 53GPublic Education System -- Local Administration

Ch. 53G-11Employees

Part 53G-11-5School District and Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind Employee Requirements

This text of Utah § 53G-11-507 (Components of educator evaluation program.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Utah Code Ann. § 53G-11-507 (2026).

Text

(1)A local school board in consultation with a joint committee established in Section 53G-11-506 shall adopt a reliable and valid educator evaluation program that evaluates educators based on educator professional standards established by the state board and includes:

(1)(a) a systematic annual evaluation of all provisional, probationary, and career educators;

(1)(b) use of multiple lines of evidence, including:

(1)(b)(i) self-evaluation;

(1)(b)(ii) student and parent input;

(1)(b)(iii) for an administrator, employee input;

(1)(b)(iv) a reasonable number of supervisor observations to ensure adequate reliability;

(1)(b)(v) evidence of professional growth and other indicators of instructional improvement based on educator professional standards established by the state board; and

(1)(b)(vi)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(1) A local school board in consultation with a joint committee established in Section 53G-11-506 shall adopt a reliable and valid educator evaluation program that evaluates educators based on educator professional standards established by the state board and includes:
(1)(a) a systematic annual evaluation of all provisional, probationary, and career educators;
(1)(b) use of multiple lines of evidence, including:
(1)(b)(i) self-evaluation;
(1)(b)(ii) student and parent input;
(1)(b)(iii) for an administrator, employee input;
(1)(b)(iv) a reasonable number of supervisor observations to ensure adequate reliability;
(1)(b)(v) evidence of professional growth and other indicators of instructional improvement based on educator professional standards established by the state board; and
(1)(b)(vi) student academic growth data;
(1)(c) a summative evaluation that differentiates among levels of performance; and
(1)(d) for an administrator, the effectiveness of evaluating employee performance in a school or school district for which the administrator has responsibility.
(2) (2)(a) An educator evaluation program described in Subsection (1) may include a reasonable number of peer observations.
(2)(b) An educator evaluation program described in Subsection (1) may not use end-of-level assessment scores in educator evaluation.