Utah § 31A-31-106 Disciplinary action.

Utah Statutes

§ 31A-31-106 — Disciplinary action.

Utah § 31A-31-106

Title 31AInsurance Code

Ch. 31A-31Insurance Fraud Act

This text of Utah § 31A-31-106 (Disciplinary action.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Utah Code Ann. § 31A-31-106 (2026).

Text

(1)If, after giving notice and a hearing conducted pursuant to Title 63G, Chapter 4, Administrative Procedures Act, the commissioner finds by a preponderance of the evidence that a person licensed under Title 31A, Insurance Code, has committed a fraudulent insurance act, the commissioner may suspend or revoke the license issued under Title 31A, Insurance Code.

(2)If the appropriate licensing authority finds by a preponderance of the evidence that a service provider violated Section 31A-31-103, the service provider is subject to revocation or suspension of the service provider's license.

(3)The commissioner may notify the appropriate licensing authority of conduct by a service provider that the commissioner believes may constitute a fraudulent insurance act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(1) If, after giving notice and a hearing conducted pursuant to Title 63G, Chapter 4, Administrative Procedures Act, the commissioner finds by a preponderance of the evidence that a person licensed under Title 31A, Insurance Code, has committed a fraudulent insurance act, the commissioner may suspend or revoke the license issued under Title 31A, Insurance Code.
(2) If the appropriate licensing authority finds by a preponderance of the evidence that a service provider violated Section 31A-31-103, the service provider is subject to revocation or suspension of the service provider's license.
(3) The commissioner may notify the appropriate licensing authority of conduct by a service provider that the commissioner believes may constitute a fraudulent insurance act.