Utah § 17-64-504 Administrative hearings and procedures -- Penalty for code violation.

Utah Statutes

§ 17-64-504 — Administrative hearings and procedures -- Penalty for code violation.

Utah § 17-64-504

Title 17Counties

Ch. 17-64County Legislative Body

Part 17-64-5Ordinances and Policies

This text of Utah § 17-64-504 (Administrative hearings and procedures -- Penalty for code violation.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Utah Code Ann. § 17-64-504 (2026).

Text

(1)A legislative body may adopt an ordinance establishing an administrative hearing process to review and decide matters relating to the violation, enforcement, or administration of a county civil ordinance, including an ordinance related to the following:

(1)(a) a building code;

(1)(b) planning and zoning;

(1)(c) animal control;

(1)(d) licensing;

(1)(e) health and safety;

(1)(f) county employment; or

(1)(g) sanitation.

(2)An ordinance adopted in accordance with Subsection (1) shall provide appropriate due process protections for a party participating in an administrative hearing.

(3)An administrative hearing held in accordance with an ordinance described in Subsection (1) may be conducted by an administrative law judge.

(4)A county may not impose a civil penalty and adjudication for t

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(1) A legislative body may adopt an ordinance establishing an administrative hearing process to review and decide matters relating to the violation, enforcement, or administration of a county civil ordinance, including an ordinance related to the following:
(1)(a) a building code;
(1)(b) planning and zoning;
(1)(c) animal control;
(1)(d) licensing;
(1)(e) health and safety;
(1)(f) county employment; or
(1)(g) sanitation.
(2) An ordinance adopted in accordance with Subsection (1) shall provide appropriate due process protections for a party participating in an administrative hearing.
(3) An administrative hearing held in accordance with an ordinance described in Subsection (1) may be conducted by an administrative law judge.
(4) A county may not impose a civil penalty and adjudication for the violation of a county moving traffic ordinance.
(5) (5)(a) A county may not impose a nonjudicial penalty for a violation of a land use regulation or a nuisance ordinance unless the county provides to the individual who is subject to the penalty written notice that:
(5)(a)(i) identifies the relevant regulation or ordinance at issue;
(5)(a)(ii) specifies the violation of the relevant regulation or ordinance; and
(5)(a)(iii) provides for a reasonable time to cure the violation, taking into account the cost of curing the violation.
(5)(b) A county may not collect on a nonjudicial penalty for a violation of a land use regulation or a nuisance ordinance that is outstanding or pending on or after May 14, 2019, unless the county imposed the outstanding or pending penalty in relation to a written notice that:
(5)(b)(i) identified the relevant regulation or ordinance at issue;
(5)(b)(ii) specified the violation of the relevant regulation or ordinance; and
(5)(b)(iii) provided for a reasonable time to cure the violation, taking into account the cost of curing the violation.