Utah § 13-1b-302 Review criteria.

Utah Statutes

§ 13-1b-302 — Review criteria.

Utah § 13-1b-302

Title 13Commerce and Trade

Ch. 13-1bOffice of Professional Licensure Review

Part 13-1b-3Office Review and Reporting

This text of Utah § 13-1b-302 (Review criteria.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Utah Code Ann. § 13-1b-302 (2026).

Text

In conducting a sunrise review, a periodic review, or a standalone review, unless otherwise directed in accordance with Subsection 13-1b-203(3), the office shall consider the following criteria:

(1)whether the regulation of the occupation is necessary to address a present, recognizable, and significant harm to the health, safety, or financial welfare of the public;

(2)for any harm to the health, safety, or financial welfare of the public, the harm's:

(2)(a) severity;

(2)(b) probability; and

(2)(c) permanence;

(3)the extent to which the proposed or existing regulation of the occupation protects against or diminishes the harm described in Subsection (1);

(4)whether the proposed or existing regulation of the occupation:

(4)(a) affects the supply of qualified practitioners;

(4)(b) creates

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In conducting a sunrise review, a periodic review, or a standalone review, unless otherwise directed in accordance with Subsection 13-1b-203(3), the office shall consider the following criteria:
(1) whether the regulation of the occupation is necessary to address a present, recognizable, and significant harm to the health, safety, or financial welfare of the public;
(2) for any harm to the health, safety, or financial welfare of the public, the harm's:
(2)(a) severity;
(2)(b) probability; and
(2)(c) permanence;
(3) the extent to which the proposed or existing regulation of the occupation protects against or diminishes the harm described in Subsection (1);
(4) whether the proposed or existing regulation of the occupation:
(4)(a) affects the supply of qualified practitioners;
(4)(b) creates barriers to:
(4)(b)(i) service that are not in the public financial welfare or interest; or
(4)(b)(ii) entry into the occupation or related occupations;
(4)(c) imposes new costs on existing practitioners;
(4)(d) affects:
(4)(d)(i) license reciprocity with other jurisdictions; or
(4)(d)(ii) mobility of practitioners; or
(4)(e) if the occupation involves a health care provider, impacts the health care provider's ability to obtain payment of benefits for the health care provider's treatment of an illness, injury, or health care condition under an insurance contract subject to Section 31A-22-618;
(5) if the review involves licensing, the potential alternative pathways for a person to obtain a license;
(6) the costs to the state of regulating the occupation;
(7) whether the proposed or existing administering agency has sufficient expertise and resources;
(8) the regulation of the occupation in other jurisdictions;
(9) the scope of the proposed or existing regulation, including:
(9)(a) whether the occupation is clearly distinguishable from an already regulated occupation; and
(9)(b) potential for regulating only certain occupational activities;
(10) the potentially less burdensome alternatives to the proposed or existing regulation and the effect of implementing an alternative method of regulation on:
(10)(a) the health, safety, or financial welfare of the public;
(10)(b) the occupation; and
(10)(c) practitioners of the occupation; and
(11) any other criteria the office adopts, including criteria suggested in a stakeholder survey.