Texas § 1104.217 DECISION ON REHEARING.

Texas Statutes

§ 1104.217 — DECISION ON REHEARING.

Texas § 1104.217

Code OCOccupations Code

This text of Texas § 1104.217 (DECISION ON REHEARING.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tex. Occupations Code Code Ann. § 1104.217 (2026).

Text

Sec. 1104.217. DECISION ON REHEARING.

(a)The decision made at the conclusion of the original contested case hearing may not be reversed or modified for a procedural, evidentiary, or other error that did not cause substantial injustice to the parties.

(b)The decision made on a rehearing may incorporate by reference any part of the decision made at the conclusion of the original hearing.

(c)On rehearing, the administrative law judge shall consider facts not presented in the original hearing if:

(1)the facts arose after the original hearing was concluded;

(2)the party offering the evidence could not reasonably have provided the evidence at the original hearing; or

(3)the party offering the evidence was misled by a party regarding the necessity for offering the evidence at the original h

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sec. 1104.217. DECISION ON REHEARING. (a) The decision made at the conclusion of the original contested case hearing may not be reversed or modified for a procedural, evidentiary, or other error that did not cause substantial injustice to the parties.
(b) The decision made on a rehearing may incorporate by reference any part of the decision made at the conclusion of the original hearing.
(c) On rehearing, the administrative law judge shall consider facts not presented in the original hearing if:
(1) the facts arose after the original hearing was concluded;
(2) the party offering the evidence could not reasonably have provided the evidence at the original hearing; or
(3) the party offering the evidence was misled by a party regarding the necessity for offering the evidence at the original hearing.
SUBCHAPTER F. OTHER ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS