Texas § 46B.0755 PROCEDURES ON CREDIBLE EVIDENCE OF IMMEDIATE RESTORATION.

Texas Statutes

§ 46B.0755 — PROCEDURES ON CREDIBLE EVIDENCE OF IMMEDIATE RESTORATION.

Texas § 46B.0755

Code CRCode of Criminal Procedure

This text of Texas § 46B.0755 (PROCEDURES ON CREDIBLE EVIDENCE OF IMMEDIATE RESTORATION.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tex. Code of Criminal Procedure Code Ann. § 46B.0755 (2026).

Text

Art. 46B.0755. PROCEDURES ON CREDIBLE EVIDENCE OF IMMEDIATE RESTORATION.

(a)Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, if the court receives credible evidence indicating that the defendant has been restored to competency at any time after the defendant's incompetency trial under Subchapter C but before the defendant is transported under Article 46B.075 to the facility or program, as applicable, the court may appoint disinterested experts to reexamine the defendant in accordance with Subchapter B. The court is not required to appoint the same expert or experts who performed the initial examination of the defendant under that subchapter.

(b)If after a reexamination of the defendant the applicable expert's report states an opinion that the defendant remains incompetent, the cou

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Art. 46B.0755. PROCEDURES ON CREDIBLE EVIDENCE OF IMMEDIATE RESTORATION. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, if the court receives credible evidence indicating that the defendant has been restored to competency at any time after the defendant's incompetency trial under Subchapter C but before the defendant is transported under Article 46B.075 to the facility or program, as applicable, the court may appoint disinterested experts to reexamine the defendant in accordance with Subchapter B. The court is not required to appoint the same expert or experts who performed the initial examination of the defendant under that subchapter.
(b) If after a reexamination of the defendant the applicable expert's report states an opinion that the defendant remains incompetent, the court's order under Article 46B.0711 , 46B.072 , or 46B.073 remains in effect, and the defendant shall be transported to the facility or program as required by Article 46B.075 . If after a reexamination of the defendant the applicable expert's report states an opinion that the defendant has been restored to competency, the court shall withdraw its order under Article 46B.0711 , 46B.072 , or 46B.073 and proceed under Subsection (c) or (d).
(c) The court shall find the defendant competent to stand trial and proceed in the same manner as if the defendant had been found restored to competency at a hearing if:
(1) both parties agree that the defendant is competent to stand trial; and
(2) the court concurs.
(d) The court shall hold a hearing to determine whether the defendant has been restored to competency if any party fails to agree or if the court fails to concur that the defendant is competent to stand trial. If a court holds a hearing under this subsection, on the request of the counsel for either party or the motion of the court, a jury shall make the competency determination. For purposes of the hearing, incompetency is presumed, and the defendant's competency must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence. If after the hearing the defendant is again found to be incompetent to stand trial, the court shall issue a new order under Article 46B.0711 , 46B.072 , or 46B.073 , as appropriate based on the defendant's current condition.

Legislative History

Added by Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 822 (H.B. 2725 ), Sec. 12, eff. September 1, 2011. Amended by: Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 748 (S.B. 1326 ), Sec. 17, eff. September 1, 2017.