Tennessee Statutes
§ 69-3-102 — Declaration of policy and purpose
Tennessee § 69-3-102
JurisdictionTennessee
Title69
This text of Tennessee § 69-3-102 (Declaration of policy and purpose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-102 (2026).
Text
(a)Recognizing that the waters of Tennessee are the property of the state and are held in public trust for the use of the people of the state, it is declared to be the public policy of Tennessee that the people of Tennessee, as beneficiaries of this trust, have a right to unpolluted waters. In the exercise of its public trust over the waters of the state, the government of Tennessee has an obligation to take all prudent steps to secure, protect, and preserve this right.
(b)It is further declared that the purpose of this part is to abate existing pollution of the waters of Tennessee, to reclaim polluted waters, to prevent the future pollution of the waters, and to plan for the future use of the waters so that the water resources of Tennessee might be used and enjoyed to the fullest extent
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
E. Ron Pickard v. Tennessee Water Quality Control Board
424 S.W.3d 511 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2013)
Rudolph Jones, Jr. Susan Jones Tandy Jones Gilliland v. City of Lakeland, Tennessee, a Tennessee Municipal Corporation
175 F.3d 410 (Sixth Circuit, 1999)
Ergon, Inc. v. Amoco Oil Co.
966 F. Supp. 577 (W.D. Tennessee, 1997)
Town of Smyrna v. Municipal Gas Authority
129 F. Supp. 3d 589 (M.D. Tennessee, 2015)
State v. Champion International Corp.
709 S.W.2d 569 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1986)
Word v. Commerce Oil Co.
847 F.2d 291 (Sixth Circuit, 1988)
Adams v. Adient US LLC
(W.D. Tennessee, 2022)
Milcrofton Utility District of Williamson County, Tennessee v. City of Brentwood, Tennessee
(M.D. Tennessee, 2020)
Starlink Logistics, Inc. v. ACC, LLC
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2018)
Jamesway Construction, Inc. v. David W. Salyers, P.E.
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2024)
State of Tennessee, ex rel. Paul G. Summers and Milton H. Hamilton, Jr. v. B&H Investments, Inc., Charles R. Smith and Alvin G. Pierce
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2004)
Legislative History
Acts 1971, ch. 164, § 2; 1977, ch. 366, § 1; T.C.A., § 70-325; Acts 1992, ch. 684, § 1.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 69-1-101
Navigable waters are highways§ 69-1-102
Opening and cleaning navigable streams§ 69-1-104
Working on streams as public roads§ 69-1-106
Compensation of supervisor§ 69-1-107
Obstructing river - Penalty§ 69-1-108
Diverting water from main channel§ 69-1-109
Temporary diversion from sluice§ 69-1-110
Damages for diversion of stream§ 69-1-111
County may permit or remove improvements§ 69-1-112
Commissioners of watercourses§ 69-1-113
Forfeiture for obstructing stream§ 69-1-114
Railroad drawbridges - Operation§ 69-1-115
Damages caused by canalizing riversCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Tennessee § 69-3-102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/tn/69-3-102.