(a)The general assembly finds and declares the following:
(1)The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 ( 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-26 ) requires, prior to the administration of a vaccine listed in the vaccine injury table to a minor, that healthcare providers provide the vaccine information statement from the centers for disease control and prevention to the legal representatives of the minor; (2)The Tennessee supreme court's decision in Cardwell v. Bechtol , 724 S.W.2d 739 (1987), found that the mature minor exception, guided by the "Rule of Sevens," is part of Tennessee common law, but only in the context of tort law and jury considerations, and not the general rule requiring parental consent for the medical treatment of minors;
(3)The Cardwell court stated, "Adoption of the mature m
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(a) The general assembly finds and declares the following: (1) The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 ( 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-26 ) requires, prior to the administration of a vaccine listed in the vaccine injury table to a minor, that healthcare providers provide the vaccine information statement from the centers for disease control and prevention to the legal representatives of the minor; (2) The Tennessee supreme court's decision in Cardwell v. Bechtol , 724 S.W.2d 739 (1987), found that the mature minor exception, guided by the "Rule of Sevens," is part of Tennessee common law, but only in the context of tort law and jury considerations, and not the general rule requiring parental consent for the medical treatment of minors; (3) The Cardwell court stated, "Adoption of the mature minor exception to the common law rule is by no means a general license to treat minors without parental consent and its application is dependent on the facts of each case. It must be seen in the context of the tort in question."; (4) Despite its holding in the case, the Cardwell court declined to alter the general rule, which is "requiring parental consent for the medical treatment of minors"; (5) In its opinion in the case of Parham v. J.R. , 442 U.S. 584 (1979), the United States supreme court wrote, "Simply because the decision of a parent is not agreeable to a child, or because it involves risks, does not automatically transfer the power to make that decision from the parents to some agency or officer of the state. The same characterizations can be made for a tonsillectomy, appendectomy, or other medical procedure. Most children, even in adolescence, simply are not able to make sound judgments concerning many decisions, including their need for medical care or treatment. Parents can and must make those judgments."; and (6) In the case of Troxel v. Granville , 530 U.S. 57 (2000), Justice O'Connor wrote for the United States supreme court, "The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause has a substantive component that 'provides heightened protection against government interference with certain fundamental rights and liberty interests,' Washington v. Glucksberg , 521 U.S. 702, 720, including parents' fundamental right to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children". (b) As used in this section: (1) "Department" means the department of health; (2) "Healthcare provider" means a healthcare professional, healthcare establishment, or healthcare facility licensed, registered, certified, or permitted pursuant to this title or title 68 or regulated under the authority of either the department of health or an agency, board, council, or committee attached to the department of health, and that is authorized to administer vaccinations in this state; (3) "Minor": (A) Means an individual who has not attained eighteen (18) years of age; and (B) Does not include an individual who: (i) Is emancipated pursuant to title 29, chapter 31; (ii) Is in need of emergency treatment pursuant to § 63-6-222 ; (iii) Is or was previously a member of the armed forces of the United States, or a member of a reserve or national guard unit; or (iv) Is the parent of a minor child and has full custody of that minor child; (4) "Vaccination" means the act of introducing a vaccine into the body; and (5) "Vaccine" means a substance intended for use in humans to stimulate the body's immune response against an infectious disease or pathogen. (c) (1) A healthcare provider shall not provide a vaccination to a minor unless the healthcare provider first receives informed consent from a parent or legal guardian of the minor. The healthcare provider shall document receipt of, and include in the minor's medical record proof of, such prior parental or guardian informed consent. (2) An employee or agent of this state shall not provide, request, or facilitate the vaccination of a minor child who is in the custody of this state, except: (A) Upon written request to, and court order from, the appropriate court; (B) If a parent or legal guardian of the minor has provided prior written informed consent to the vaccination; or (C) If the parental rights of each of the minor's parents or legal guardians have been terminated by a court, and all opportunities for appeal have been exhausted. (3) A violation of this section is an unlawful practice and is grounds for the offending healthcare provider's licensing authority to suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew the healthcare provider's license or take other disciplinary action allowed by law. (4) If the licensing authority of a healthcare provider receives information of a violation or potential violation of this section by the healthcare provider, then the licensing authority shall conduct an immediate investigation and take appropriate disciplinary action. (d) To the extent this section conflicts with another law, this section controls.