Tennessee § 4-5-212 Remand of rule that may constitute potentially unreasonable restraint of trade

Tennessee Statutes

§ 4-5-212 — Remand of rule that may constitute potentially unreasonable restraint of trade

Tennessee § 4-5-212

Title4

This text of Tennessee § 4-5-212 (Remand of rule that may constitute potentially unreasonable restraint of trade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-212 (2026).

Text

Prior to a rule being filed by a regulatory board, as defined in § 4-4-125(a) , with the secretary of state pursuant to § 4-5-207 or § 4-5-208 , the commissioner or chief executive officer of the administrative department under which a regulatory board operates or to which a regulatory board is administratively attached, or a designee to the extent a conflict of interest may exist with respect to the commissioner or chief executive officer, will remand a rule that may constitute a potentially unreasonable restraint of trade to the regulatory board for additional information, further proceedings, or modification, if the rule is not consistent with a clearly articulated state policy or law established by the general assembly with respect to the regulatory board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prior to a rule being filed by a regulatory board, as defined in § 4-4-125(a) , with the secretary of state pursuant to § 4-5-207 or § 4-5-208 , the commissioner or chief executive officer of the administrative department under which a regulatory board operates or to which a regulatory board is administratively attached, or a designee to the extent a conflict of interest may exist with respect to the commissioner or chief executive officer, will remand a rule that may constitute a potentially unreasonable restraint of trade to the regulatory board for additional information, further proceedings, or modification, if the rule is not consistent with a clearly articulated state policy or law established by the general assembly with respect to the regulatory board.