South Dakota § 49-31-58 Alternative methods of assigning costs for certain services.

South Dakota Statutes

§ 49-31-58 — Alternative methods of assigning costs for certain services.

South Dakota § 49-31-58

Title 49PUBLIC UTILITIES AND CARRIERS

Ch. 49-29TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES

This text of South Dakota § 49-31-58 (Alternative methods of assigning costs for certain services.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S.D. Codified Laws § 49-31-58 (2026).

Text

If it is determined to be in the public interest, the commission may utilize cost allocation methods other than fully distributed methods as provided for in § 49-31-4 for the assignment of costs among jointly provided noncompetitive services, emerging competitive services, or fully competitive services. In determining whether any alternative method of assigning costs is in the public interest the commission shall consider:

(1)The impact of the method on efforts to preserve universal telecommunications service;

(2)The extent to which the method will promote competition and facilitate the offering of advanced telecommunications services to all classes of ratepayers throughout the state; and (3) Any other factors that the commission considers relevant to the public interest.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

If it is determined to be in the public interest, the commission may utilize cost allocation methods other than fully distributed methods as provided for in § 49-31-4 for the assignment of costs among jointly provided noncompetitive services, emerging competitive services, or fully competitive services. In determining whether any alternative method of assigning costs is in the public interest the commission shall consider: (1) The impact of the method on efforts to preserve universal telecommunications service; (2) The extent to which the method will promote competition and facilitate the offering of advanced telecommunications services to all classes of ratepayers throughout the state; and (3) Any other factors that the commission considers relevant to the public interest.