South Dakota Statutes
§ 46A-3C-4 — Vote for or against dissolution--Effect--Election costs.
South Dakota § 46A-3C-4
This text of South Dakota § 46A-3C-4 (Vote for or against dissolution--Effect--Election costs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
S.D. Codified Laws § 46A-3C-4 (2026).
Text
If at least fifty percent of the votes cast are in favor of dissolving the water development district, the Board of Water and Natural Resources must, by resolution, dissolve the district and file a copy of the resolution with the secretary of state. If the vote is against dissolving the district, another vote may not be held on the question of dissolution for four years. A new election may not be held unless a new petition has been submitted to the Board of Water and Natural Resources. The costs associated with an election to dissolve a district are the responsibility of the affected district.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Legislative History
SL 1984 (SS), ch 1, § 27; SL 1990, ch 362, § 4; SL 1991, ch 17 (Ex. Ord. 91-4), § 17; SL 2025, ch 186, § 36.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 46A-1-1
Legislative findings and policy.§ 46A-1-100
Definition of terms.§ 46A-1-102
Disbursement and administration of money from subfunds--Rules--Application of provisions.§ 46A-1-103
Promulgation of rules by board--Content.§ 46A-1-13
Presentation of cost data to Governor and Legislature--Requests for financing authorization.§ 46A-1-13.10
Lewis and Clark Rural Water System authorized.§ 46A-1-13.11
Southern Black Hills Water System authorized.§ 46A-1-13.12
Belle Fourche irrigation upgrade project authorized.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
South Dakota § 46A-3C-4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/sd/46A-3C-4.