This text of South Dakota § 46A-15-6 (Settlement framework--Short-term objectives.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
South Dakota's Pick-Sloan settlement framework shall consist of short - term objectives enumerated in this section, long - term objectives pursuant to § 46A-15-7 , and the Missouri River cost recovery program pursuant to § 46A-15-9 . The short - term objectives shall include, at federal expense, the projects and total project costs enumerated in this section, subject to nonfederal cost - sharing requirements established by Congress and agreed to by the Governor or a designated agent of the Governor and the appropriate local project sponsors. The short - term objectives and the estimated 1986 costs, subject to adjustments as needed, to achieve such objectives are as follows:
(1)Completion of the following projects already under construction:
(a)The Belle Fourche Irrigation Rehabilit
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
South Dakota's Pick-Sloan settlement framework shall consist of short - term objectives enumerated in this section, long - term objectives pursuant to § 46A-15-7 , and the Missouri River cost recovery program pursuant to § 46A-15-9 . The short - term objectives shall include, at federal expense, the projects and total project costs enumerated in this section, subject to nonfederal cost - sharing requirements established by Congress and agreed to by the Governor or a designated agent of the Governor and the appropriate local project sponsors. The short - term objectives and the estimated 1986 costs, subject to adjustments as needed, to achieve such objectives are as follows: (1) Completion of the following projects already under construction: (a) The Belle Fourche Irrigation Rehabilitation Project at forty - two million two hundred thousand dollars remaining total cost; (b) The WEB Rural Water Development Project at twenty - five million dollars remaining total cost; (2) Development of the following projects proposed for construction, for which planning has been completed: (a) The Lake Andes - Wagner/Yankton Sioux (Marty II) Irrigation Project at one hundred sixty - five million dollars total cost; (b) The Mni Wiconi Rural Water System at one hundred million dollars total cost; (3) Development of the following projects proposed for construction for which further planning is required: (a) Multipurpose water supply and irrigation features of the Gregory County Hydroelectric Pumped Storage Facility at one hundred million dollars total cost; (b) James River Flood Control at twenty million dollars total cost; (c) The Mid-Dakota Rural Water System at one hundred million dollars total cost; (d) Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation at thirty - five million dollars total cost; (e) Missouri River Streambank Erosion Control at seventy - five million dollars total cost; (f) Integration into the Pick - Sloan program for Missouri River Riverside Irrigation Projects at five million dollars for federal study purposes, subject to recommendation by the Missouri River Cost Recovery Authority; (g) Rural and municipal water systems at one hundred million dollars total cost; and (h) Lewis and Clark Rural Water System at one hundred million dollars total cost.