South Dakota Statutes
§ 35-11-1 — Legislative finding--Abrogation of former rule.
The Legislature finds that the consumption of alcoholic beverages, rather than the serving of alcoholic beverages, is the proximate cause of any injury inflicted upon another by an intoxicated person. Therefore, the rule in Walz v. City of Hudson, 327 N.W. 2nd 120 (S.D. 1982) is hereby abrogated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
South Dakota § 35-11-1 (Legislative finding--Abrogation of former rule.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc.
424 N.W.2d 649 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1988)
Baatz v. Arrow Bar
426 N.W.2d 298 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1988)
Wegleitner v. Sattler
1998 SD 88 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1998)
Vilhauer v. Horsemens' Sports, Inc.
1999 SD 93 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1999)
McGuire v. DEAN J. CURRY
2009 SD 40 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2009)
Wegleiter v. Sattler
1998 SD 88 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1998)
Legislative History
SL 1985, ch 295, § 1.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 35-1-1
Definition of terms.§ 35-1-10
Repealed§ 35-1-3
Certain revenue department employees prohibited from engaging in alcoholic beverage business.§ 35-1-5.1
Bottle clubs prohibited.§ 35-1-5.2
Repealed