South Dakota Statutes
§ 16-22-6 — Admissibility of drug court participant's statements and reports in legal proceedings.
South Dakota § 16-22-6
This text of South Dakota § 16-22-6 (Admissibility of drug court participant's statements and reports in legal proceedings.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
S.D. Codified Laws § 16-22-6 (2026).
Text
Nothing contained in this section may be construed to permit a judge to impose, modify, or reduce a sentence below the minimum sentence required by law. No statement made by a drug court participant in connection with the court's program or directives, nor any report made by the staff of the court or program connected to the court, regarding a participant's use of controlled substances is admissible as evidence against the participant in any legal proceeding or prosecution. However, if the participant violates the conditions or is terminated from drug court, the reasons for the violation or termination may be considered in sanctioning, sentencing, or otherwise disposing of the participant's case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Legislative History
SL 2013, ch 101, § 6.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 16-1-1
Supreme Court districts.§ 16-1-2.2
Form of retention ballot.§ 16-1-3
§ 16-1-3§ 16-1-4
Repealed§ 16-1-9
Term of Supreme Court--Places.§ 16-10-1
Repealed§ 16-10-2.1
, 16-10-2.2§ 16-10-3
Repealed§ 16-10-5
§ 16-10-5Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
South Dakota § 16-22-6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/sd/16-22-6.