South Dakota Statutes
§ 1-26-26 — Ex parte communications by agency personnel in contested cases--Investigating officer disqualified from decision making--Authorized communications.
Unless required for the disposition of ex parte matters authorized by law, members of the governing board or officers or employees of an agency assigned to render a decision or to make findings of fact and conclusions of law in a contested case may not communicate, directly or indirectly, in connection with any issue of fact, with any person or party, nor, in connection with any issue of law, with any party or the party's representative, except upon notice and opportunity for all parties to participate. If one or more members of a board or commission or a member or employee of an agency, who is assigned to render a decision in a contested case, took part in an investigation upon which the contested case is based, the member or employee may not participate in the conduct of the hearing nor
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
South Dakota § 1-26-26 (Ex parte communications by agency personnel in contested cases--Investigating officer disqualified from decision making--Authorized communications.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Application of SDDS, Inc.
472 N.W.2d 502 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1991)
Romey v. Landers
392 N.W.2d 415 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1986)
Armstrong v. Turner County Board of Adjustment
2009 SD 81 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2009)
Apoian v. State
235 N.W.2d 641 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1975)
Zeig v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division
337 N.W.2d 435 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1983)
In Re Tinklenberg
2006 SD 52 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2006)
Legislative History
SL 1966, ch 159, § 13; SL 1974, ch 16, § 9; SL 1975, ch 17, § 10; SL 2015, ch 4, § 2.