South Carolina Statutes

§ 56-7-10 — Use of uniform traffic ticket; vesting of jurisdiction; forms; utilization of electronic devices.

South Carolina § 56-7-10
JurisdictionSouth Carolina
Title 56MOTOR VEHICLES
Ch. 7TRAFFIC TICKETS

This text of South Carolina § 56-7-10 (Use of uniform traffic ticket; vesting of jurisdiction; forms; utilization of electronic devices.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S.C. Code Ann. § 56-7-10 (2026).

Text

(A)There will be a uniform traffic ticket used by all law enforcement officers in arrests for traffic offenses and for the following additional offenses:
(1)Interfering with Police Officer Serving Process Section 16-5-50;
(2)Dumping Trash on Highway/Private Property Section 16-11-700;
(3)Indecent Exposure Section 16-15-130;
(4)Disorderly Conduct Section 16-17-530;
(5)Damaging Highway Section 57-7-10;
(6)Place Glass, Nails, etc. on Highway Section 57-7-20;
(7)Obstruction of Highway by Railroad Cars, etc. Section 57-7-240;
(8)Signs Permitted on Interstate Section 57-25-140;
(9)Brown Bagging Section 61-5-20;
(10)Drinking Liquors in Public Conveyance Section 61-13-360;
(11)Poles Dragging on Highway Section 57-7-80;
(12)Open Container Section 61-9-87;
(13)Purchase or Possession of

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Legislative History

HISTORY: 1962 Code SECTION 46-871; 1967 (55) 203; 1971 (57) 474; 1980 Act No. 353, SECTION 1; 1984 Act No. 467; 1985 Act No. 158, SECTION 1; 1987 Act No. 185 SECTION 2; 1993 Act No. 181, SECTION 1468; 1996 Act No; 459, SECTION 214; 2003 Act No. 54, SECTION 2; 2005 Act No. 68, SECTION 1, eff May 23, 2005; 2013 Act No. 78, SECTION 1, eff June 13, 2013; 2015 Act No. 58 (S.3), Pt II, SECTION 8, eff June 4, 2015; 2019 Act No. 44 (S.281), SECTION 2, eff May 16, 2019. Editor's Note 2019 Act No. 44, preamble, provides as follows: "Whereas, service animals that are properly trained to assist persons with disabilities play a vital role in establishing independence for such persons; and "Whereas, the term "service animal" has a distinct meaning in the law. A service animal means an animal that is trained for the purposes of assisting or accommodating the sensory, mental, or physical disability of a disabled person. Under the law, the provision of emotional support, well-being, comfort, or companionship does not constitute the work or tasks of a service animal; and "Whereas, no vest, other marking, or documentation is required for an animal to qualify as a service animal, nor are such vests, markings, or documentation a reliable indication of whether an animal is, by law, a service animal. People sometimes erroneously think that a therapy animal, an emotional support animal, or any animal wearing a vest or having any other type of marking is a service animal as defined by law; and "Whereas, there is an increasing number of occurrences in which people exploit the confusion related to service animals and attempt to bring an animal into a place that it would otherwise not be allowed to enter by passing off the pet, therapy animal, or emotional support animal as a service animal, either by oral misrepresentation, placement of a vest or other marking on the animal, or presentation of a "certificate", despite knowing that it is not a service animal; and "Whereas, some companies mislead individuals into believing that they will be entitled to the rights or privileges for individuals with disabilities with service animals if they buy the company's vests or obtain some type of certificate. These misrepresentations, in some cases, are unlawful deceptive trade practices and compound the confusion around service animals; and "Whereas, commendably, federal and state laws require places of public accommodation, including airports, restaurants, theaters, stores, hospitals, and more, to allow any animal that is presented as a service animal into the place of public accommodation. These same places of public accommodation face a dilemma if someone enters the premises and intentionally misrepresents his animal as a service animal; and "Whereas, when people try to falsely represent a nonservice animal as a service animal, business owners and other places of public accommodation become increasingly distrustful that the animals being represented to them as service animals are, in fact, service animals. Misrepresentation of service animals delegitimizes the program and makes it harder for persons with disabilities to gain unquestioned acceptance of their legitimate, properly trained, and essential service animals. Now, therefore, [Text of Act]." Effect of Amendment 2019 Act No. 44, SECTION 2, in (A), inserted the (1) to (54) identifiers and removed the column formatting, and added (55), relating to misrepresenting service animals.

Nearby Sections

10
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
South Carolina § 56-7-10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/sc/56-7-10.