South Carolina Statutes

§ 5-31-230 — Municipalities in which there are no board of commissioners of public works.

South Carolina § 5-31-230
JurisdictionSouth Carolina
Title 5MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS
Ch. 31ELECTRICITY, WATER, NATURAL GAS AND SEWERAGE SYSTEMS

This text of South Carolina § 5-31-230 (Municipalities in which there are no board of commissioners of public works.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S.C. Code Ann. § 5-31-230 (2026).

Text

The following cities and towns shall have no board of commissioners of public works: Abbeville, Allendale, Barnwell, Beaufort, Belton, Bennettsville, Blackville, Bluffton, Bowman, Branchville, Camden, Central, Chapin, Cheraw, Cherry Grove Beach, Chesnee, Chester, Clemson, Clinton, Clio, Clover, Conway, Cowpens, Crescent Beach, Denmark, Dillon, Donalds, Due West, Duncan, Edgefield, Elgin, Estill, Fairfax, Forest Acres, Fort Mill, Fountain Inn, Georgetown, Goose Creek, Govan, Great Falls, Hampton, Hardeeville, Heath Springs, Hemingway, Hilda, Honea Path, Irmo, Iva, Jamestown, Johnston, Kingstree, Lake City, Lamar, Lancaster, Landrum, Lane, Latta, Lexington, Liberty, Little Mountain, Lodge, Loris, Lyman, Marion, McCall, Moneta, Mullins, Myrtle Beach, Newberry, North Augusta, Norway, Ocean Dri

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Legislative History

HISTORY: 1962 Code SECTION 59-174; 1952 Code SECTION 59-174; 1942 Code SECTIONS 7281, 7675-6, 7675-22, 7675-27, 7675-38, 7675-39; 1932 Code SECTION 7281; Civ. C. '22 SECTION 4431; Civ. C. '12 SECTION 3016; Civ. C. '02 SECTION 2009; 1896 (22) 83; 1899 (23) 50; 1900 (23) 383; 1904 (24) 403; 1907 (25) 625; 1913 (28) 48; 1915 (29) 61; 1916 (29) 826, 946; 1917 (30) 60; 1918 (30) 715, 717; 1920 (31) 716, 786; 1921 (32) 39, 196, 248; 1922 (32) 781, 789, 794, 834, 896; 1923 (33) 158, 162; 1924 (33) 1062; 1925 (34) 7, 246, 265; 1926 (34) 918, 977; 1927 (35) 119, 171, 210; 1928 (35) 1143; 1929 (36) 40, 45, 49; 1930 (36) 1248, 1403; 1931 (37) 126, 196, 302; 1932 (37) 1350, 1408; 1933 (38) 466, 515; 1934 (38) 1473; 1936 (39) 1368, 1480; 1940 (41) 1815; 1942 (42) 1446, 1482; 1946 (44) 1347, 1355, 1403; 1947 (45) 296, 520, 533; 1948 (45) 1661, 2017; 1949 (46) 149; 1950 (46) 1923, 1928, 1952, 2011, 2029, 2152, 2233, 2321; 1951 (47) 364; 1952 (47) 2076; 1953 (48) 33, 39, 182, 256; 1954 (48) 1529, 1846; 1955 (49) 15, 132; 1956 (49) 1591, 1800, 1985; 1957 (50) 5, 7; 1958 (50) 1901; 1959 (51) 47, 144; 1960 (51) 1547; 1962 (52) 2238; 1963 (53) 18, 283, 603; 1964 (53) 1789, 1790, 1827, 2170, 2363; 1965 (54) 36, 325; 1966 (54) 2005, 2032; 1967 (55) 23, 327, 571, 914; 1968 (55) 2269, 2276, 2381, 2406; 1969 (56) 11, 19, 32, 60, 321; 1970 (56) 1897, 2002, 2551, 2647, 2650; 1971 (57) 21, 167, 1089; 1972 (57) 2309, 2403, 3115; 1973 (58) 187; 2005 Act No. 22, SECTION 1, eff March 22, 2005; 2012 Act No. 145, SECTION 1, eff April 2, 2012. Effect of Amendment The 2005 amendment reworded this section to divide it into two sentences and in the first sentence, added "Westminster" and in the second sentence redesignated items (d) and (e) as items (c) and (d) and added item (e) relating to the city of Westminster. The 2012 amendment added "Tega Cay"; and substituted "after that time" for "thereafter" in subsection (d).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
South Carolina § 5-31-230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/sc/31/5-31-230.