South Carolina § 15-61-390 Determination of manifest prejudice or injury to cotenants as a group.

South Carolina Statutes

§ 15-61-390 — Determination of manifest prejudice or injury to cotenants as a group.

South Carolina § 15-61-390

Title 15CIVIL REMEDIES AND PROCEDURES

Ch. 61PARTITION

This text of South Carolina § 15-61-390 (Determination of manifest prejudice or injury to cotenants as a group.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S.C. Code Ann. § 15-61-390 (2026).

Text

(A)In determining pursuant to Section 15-61-380(A) whether partition in kind or partition by allotment would result in manifest prejudice or manifest injury to the cotenants as a group, the court shall consider the following:

(1)whether the heirs' property practicably can be divided among the cotenants;

(2)whether partition in kind or partition by allotment would apportion the property in such a way that the aggregate fair market value of the parcels resulting from the division would be materially less than the value of the property if it were sold as a whole, taking into account the condition under which a court-ordered sale likely would occur;

(3)evidence of the collective duration of ownership or possession of the property by a cotenant and one or more predecessors in title or prede

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(A) In determining pursuant to Section 15-61-380(A) whether partition in kind or partition by allotment would result in manifest prejudice or manifest injury to the cotenants as a group, the court shall consider the following: (1) whether the heirs' property practicably can be divided among the cotenants; (2) whether partition in kind or partition by allotment would apportion the property in such a way that the aggregate fair market value of the parcels resulting from the division would be materially less than the value of the property if it were sold as a whole, taking into account the condition under which a court-ordered sale likely would occur; (3) evidence of the collective duration of ownership or possession of the property by a cotenant and one or more predecessors in title or predecessors in possession to the cotenant who are or were relatives of the cotenant or each other; (4) a cotenant's sentimental attachment to the property, including any attachment arising because the property has ancestral or other unique or special value to the cotenant; (5) the lawful use being made of the property by a cotenant and the degree to which the cotenant would be harmed if the cotenant could not continue the same use of the property; (6) the degree to which the cotenants have contributed their pro rata share of the property taxes, insurance, and other expenses associated with maintaining ownership of the property or have contributed to the physical improvement, maintenance, or upkeep of the property; and (7) any other relevant factor. (B) The court may not consider any one factor in subsection (A) to be dispositive without weighing the totality of all relevant factors and circumstances.

Legislative History

HISTORY: 2016 Act No. 153 (H.3325), SECTION 1, eff January 1, 2017. Editor's Note 2016 Act No. 153, SECTION 6, provides as follows: "SECTION 6. This act takes effect on January 1, 2017, and applies to partition actions filed on or after that date."