§ 5-36.1-16. Refusal or revocation of a license — Process.
(a) The division of professional regulation of the department of health may, after notice
and hearing, in its discretion, refuse to grant the license provided for in this chapter
to any doctor of naturopathy who has violated any of the laws of the state affecting
the ability of any doctor of naturopathy to practice naturopathy, or who had been
guilty of unprofessional conduct or conduct of a character likely to deceive or defraud
the public, and may, after notice and hearing, revoke or suspend any license issued
or granted by it for like causes or for any fraud or deception committed
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
§ 5-36.1-16. Refusal or revocation of a license — Process.
(a) The division of professional regulation of the department of health may, after notice
and hearing, in its discretion, refuse to grant the license provided for in this chapter
to any doctor of naturopathy who has violated any of the laws of the state affecting
the ability of any doctor of naturopathy to practice naturopathy, or who had been
guilty of unprofessional conduct or conduct of a character likely to deceive or defraud
the public, and may, after notice and hearing, revoke or suspend any license issued
or granted by it for like causes or for any fraud or deception committed in obtaining
the license.
(b) The division of professional regulation of the department of health may refuse to
accept the return of a license tendered by the subject of a disciplinary investigation
and may notify relevant state, federal, and local agencies and appropriate bodies
in other states of the status of any pending or completed disciplinary case against
the licensee, provided that notice against the licensee has been served or disciplinary
action against that person has been taken.
(c) The division of professional regulation of the department of health shall serve a
copy of its decision or ruling upon any person whose certificate has been revoked
or refused.
(d) The burden of proof in a disciplinary action shall be on the state to show by a preponderance
of the evidence that the person has engaged in unprofessional conduct.