Rhode Island § 37-2-47 § 37-2-47. Failure to render timely decisions.

Rhode Island Statutes

§ 37-2-47 — § 37-2-47. Failure to render timely decisions.

Rhode Island § 37-2-47

Title 37Public Property and Works

Ch. 37-2State Purchases

This text of Rhode Island § 37-2-47 (§ 37-2-47. Failure to render timely decisions.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R.I. Gen. Laws § 37-2-47 (2026).

Text

§ 37-2-47. Failure to render timely decisions.
This section shall apply to a claim or controversy arising under contracts between
            the state and its contractors. If the claim or controversy is not resolved by mutual
            agreement, the chief purchasing officer or his or her designee, shall promptly issue
            a decision in writing. A copy of that decision shall be mailed or otherwise furnished
            to the contractor. If the chief purchasing officer does not issue a written decision
            within thirty (30) days after written request for a final decision, or within such
            longer period as might be established by the parties to the contract in writing, then
            the c

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

§ 37-2-47. Failure to render timely decisions.

This section shall apply to a claim or controversy arising under contracts between the state and its contractors. If the claim or controversy is not resolved by mutual agreement, the chief purchasing officer or his or her designee, shall promptly issue a decision in writing. A copy of that decision shall be mailed or otherwise furnished to the contractor. If the chief purchasing officer does not issue a written decision within thirty (30) days after written request for a final decision, or within such longer period as might be established by the parties to the contract in writing, then the contractor may proceed as if an adverse decision had been received.